IN THE KEG}-I COURT 0!' KARHATAKA
CIRCUIT 3ENCH AT DHARWAD
mm}: mm mm am mm or JANuAn.if,'2¢:J:o9,'_T.'V. %
amrom
was I-{0N'BLE MRJus':'1<it:VH;§1'1}LAiir§i A.
WRIT gg-rr'r1_9__x 'r:¢§,§o18g_/mgmao§%iM
___--
-ro 6o;9o/zooeyaac-%com% -'
BETWEEN:
1.
ADMINISTRATOR, ‘
THE SSK c:o–0f9.’BANI§;LTD’.;; _ V ,_
DAJIBANPETH,f~§Lr13LI.’. =i ” _
Sm’ JAYASHREE V.’ ‘ :
AGED ABOLIT”-E?i;XEARS, V ~
GENERAL«MAjNAGijE-Ex’, ” , ‘
THE ssx C04€;rP..13z=–.NK« ;.’Fi1_., . ;
HUBLL * V ”
BRANCH”MANAGER(GADA§3 BRANCH)
AGED ABOUT ’52 .Y.§3AR.S,
‘mf–;,j: SSK C0–O?__BANK LTD. HUBLI.
E ….. .4 « PETITIONERS
(B3? .._Is*c§2-£1: .9. mam, ADV.)
‘ ‘ ..ACéE: 4:2, OCC:HOU’SEHOLE) WORK,
SM’? RKEESHWARI MALAKAJAPPA GOUDAR,
R /{.1 BASAVANA BAGEWADL
f}§..S’.!’ BIJAPUR
SR1 MALAKAJAPPA BASAPPA GOUDAR
“AGE 48 YEARS OCC: MANAGER 0?’ LEC
Rf C) BASAVANA BAGEWADI,
V _
DIST BIJAPUR.
3′. THE GAI”.).PsG CONSUMER DISPUTE
REDRESSAL FORUM, GADAG.
4. THE UNION 05* INDIA,
REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY ‘I’C} ‘ . .
GOVERNMENT, IDEPARTMENF OF 1éficm.- A in
AND supmas, NEW DEIML ‘ = _V 1. _ _ V
V V 4 …iegsPoNDEraTs 4
THESE WRIT PETITIONS PsRE*~..F1LED.UN;DER ARTECLES
226 AND 227′ OF’ THE cNs*1’i’ru’:*2a:)Is; OF INIBIAT ‘PRAYSNG TO
QUASH THE SHOW CASUE NOTICE DATE–D 11/9}-2.Q08,”ISSUED
TO PETITIONER 2 AND v3″~¥3Y 3:23 _1N–.Ex§;<:UT1oN PETITIONS
M0216/O8 FILED BY R1 a1srr;1%2.A*nfA1+;;1§EX1IVI?E' ARE) ETC.
TI§IESE_A\?J":§"§fI' _F};iTYi'I€5N$ COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARzNG–.'_m:s B£\_Y,.fi'Eji.}':°.~. v4<::;§u=–3_'1' MADE THE FOLLOWING:
1: 6finER
V. , tg tht; re'spondents 1 to 4 is dispensed With.
H " 'V2. the icarned counsel for the petitioners.
A these writ petitions under Arblcles 226 and
'.227 cf {féénstitution of India, the petitioners have called
V} ' ..:is1AAqim;gati<v:$;r1!t}1e: Show cause notice dated 11/09; 2008, issued
— A3f5~ respomlentfvide Anncxme “C”.
Li//..
4. The petitioners have already subnnittegi
objections to the show cause notice. Insteaq – “it,~: _
they have approached this court. Then.-fo:re,
cannotbe entertam ed. i »’ . n
5. Accordingly,’ w:1’1;nee.1′?–$e:i1-has diemissed.
However, the 3″‘ respoigtienf ‘to consider the
objections and pass appropn}ate’– Fnocordance with
law;wI’thin Hiveceipt of a copy of
Sd/-‘
Judge