IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 34482 of 2008(E)
1. RENJINI.S, UPSA
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
... Respondent
2. THE MANAGER,
For Petitioner :SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :24/11/2008
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC, J
-----------------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C).No.34482/2008
-----------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 24th day of November, 2008
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is an UPSA appointed in the school, of which
the 2nd respondent is the Manager. In this writ petition it is
complained that following Ext.P1, the order of appointment
issued by the Manager, proposal for the approval of the
appointment of the petitioner has been submitted to the
first respondent. It is contended that, despite the lapse of
time, orders have not been passed by the first respondent
on the proposal seeking approval of her appointment. It is
with that grievance the writ petition is filed.
2. Having regard to the facts as above, the appropriate
order to be passed at this stage is to direct the first
respondent to consider and pass orders on the proposal
made by the 2nd respondent seeking approval of the
2
appointment of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing
that, if a proposal seeking approval of the appointment of
the petitioner has been received from the second
respondent and the same is pending, the first respondent
shall consider and pass orders on the same, as expeditiously
as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of
production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of
the writ petition.
Petitioner shall produce a a copy of the judgment along
with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent
for compliance.
ANTONY DOMINIC
JUDGE
vi.
3