High Court Kerala High Court

Abdul Sathar.A.M vs The Assistant Executive Engineer on 30 September, 2008

Kerala High Court
Abdul Sathar.A.M vs The Assistant Executive Engineer on 30 September, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 18959 of 2008(F)


1. ABDUL SATHAR.A.M, S/O.MAMMUNHI HAJEE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.V.SOHAN

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :30/09/2008

 O R D E R
                        V.GIRI, J.
       -------------------------
               W.P.(C).No.18959 of 2008
       -------------------------
        Dated this the 30th day of September, 2008.


                      JUDGMENT

The petitioner was awarded the contract

work of formation of Deep Earthen drain leading

channel from KM.18/00 to 21/00 of Cherjalsoor

road.

2. It seems that the original assessment

was revised on account of a deviation brought

about by reason of interference by the local

merchants. The petitioner submits that, after

the completion of the work, check measurement

was conducted and the amount was sanctioned.

Nevertheless, payment has not been effected.

Hence this writ petition.

3. In the counter affidavit filed by the

Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works

Department, Road Sub Division, Kasaragod, it is

admitted that the work was completed by the

petitioner finally on 12.7.2007. But, there was

delay in completion of the same. It is further

stated that certain other defects were pointed

out by the Assistant Executive Engineer vide his

letter dated 21.7.2007 Ext.R(d) and such defects

have not been cured by the petitioner.

W.P.(C).NO.18959/08

:: 2 ::

Having heard learned counsel for the

petitioner and the learned Government Pleader,

the writ petition is disposed of directing the

respondent to finalise the check measurements of

the work done by the petitioner. In the

meanwhile, if there are defects in the work done

by the petitioner, the petitioner shall rectify

the same. This shall be done within a period of

two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

this judgment. Thereupon, the bill submitted by

the petitioner, shall, subject to satisfactory

completion of the work, as determined by the

respondent, be paid without any delay, but in

accordance with the list of priority maintained

in the office of the Assistant Executive

Engineer. The whole process shall be completed

within two months from the date of receipt of a

copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

(V.GIRI)
JUDGE
sk/

//true copy//