High Court Karnataka High Court

The Deputy Chief Engineer vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 4 March, 2010

Karnataka High Court
The Deputy Chief Engineer vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 4 March, 2010
Author: Aravind Kumar
1 MFA 2734/O9

iN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS ON THE 04"" DAY OF MARCH 2010

BEFORE

THE) HOE\§'I3LE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND Kugx-:iAR..'   .;. A' 

1\/HSCELLANEOUS mas'? APPEAL No.2734_,.z2.eC;9 (Lg./1-jg_<;)_ 3 7' "

BEIIVVEEN

The Deputy Chief Engineer

{Construction} ,

South Western Raiiway.

No.18. Millers Road.

Contonment,   p  V .   _

Bangalore 560 048.    _ L"-..f.»._APPELLANT/S

{By Smt. KS. A1j1,1S;L1ya :i's';:»I\§y_.213/V'aIis1iV;Vtra Advocates.)
A Mn "" "
1 . The':La"n'd   'C)_fl"ie_'e1*.

And As S'isVta§e:ie_ Coin m"i--s__s'i:;her.
Chickalnagalur. A ' 

2. Ssri';Chand1*e1.s_f1eka1'é..

 Q..__Sri__. Chah11vab«a'sappa.
A  Agef fvlajor,
 "E-Iir'e.r41iaga11ir.
-IjChivci§ama.;;-a.1'L1r Taiuk 3: District.  RESPONDENT/S

*****

7..irhis.-M'_:'?jA'fi1ed 11/S 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act

 'against '.t1"i'e«Vjudgn1eni and award c1atec1:16.04,2008 passed in
'"'~___LAC No.9Qi2006 on the file of the Civil Judge [S1'.Dr1.] and



2 MFA 2734:/O9

CJM, Chikmagalur, allowing the relerence petition for
enhanced compensation.

This MFA coming on for Orders this day. the'
delivered the following:  v '  A'

JUDGMENT

The Registry had raised certain Qffice ,.oli3jeeitti«o:ns_aVn’d’onY

account of non cornplainance. the niatteiwvas listjedlon lG;~(3.1;~_

2010 and it was adjourned by twolrweelis office

objections. Subsequently: lltlpthe llearned counsel
for the appellant has filed return of the
appeal papers topvenaole /Pefore the District
Court. the present appeal

is less tliaii

2. Merrie-list aL¢¢e;:i;ea__;mc1 the appellant is permitted to

.-v..withd»l’awv the View of the Memo filed for seeking

V’:pcrrr1i_ssion*.toflvithdraw the appeal and same having been

accepted llh§:ll.’thisp;;.Clo’urt, appeilant, would be entitled for refund

of fee, which has been paid on the appeal

_ V A rne’mo.1’andlurr1.

3 MFA 2734/09

3. The Registry is dircacted 10 return the appeal papers to

the learned counsel to enable them to file the same

jurisdictional Court. The Court fee paid on this.~é’:1:Ig-)}9r3a.V1:

ordered to be refunded. –