High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Banshi Dhar Pandey vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 17 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Banshi Dhar Pandey vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 17 August, 2011
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                 Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2123 of 2011
                  Banshi Dhar Pandey, S/o Late Jagdish Pandey, Resident of
                  Lalbag, Professor's Colony, Qr. No.-7, Sarai, Bhagalpur,
                  District- Bhagalpur, At present posted as Professor (Chemistry)
                  P.G. Department, T.M.Bhagalpur University
                                                    Versus
                  1. The State of Bihar through J.P.Singh, presently posted as
                     Director, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
                  2. Dr. K.N.Dubey, presently posted as Vice-Chancellor,
                     T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur
                  3. Dr. Rajiv Ranjan Sinha, presently posted as Registrar,
                     T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur
                           ----------------------------------

3. 17.8.2011 Learned counsel for the Tilka Manjhi University

states that the grievance of the petitioner has been fully

redressed. The petitioner consequent upon judgment of this

Court has to superannuate on attaining the age of 65 years.

Learned counsel for the University states that he has not only

been reinstated but his status restored and full payment of

salary made.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that till this

morning his client has not received any payment.

Learned counsel for the University states that he

has instruction from the Finance Officer that Cheque No.

637257 dated 14.8.2011 has been issued for Rs. 2,10,452/- as

the net payment which would take care of the arrears as well.
-2-

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, in my

view, it seems that though the cheque has been issued but the

same is not yet handed over to the petitioner. Thus,

technically both sides are correct but in practical the order of

this Court remains to be complied. However, as instructions

have been received by the learned counsel for the University

from the Finance Officer which I have no reason to

disbelieve, I dispose of this contempt application with a

direction that if payment has not been credited to the account

of the petitioner the same shall be ensured to be credited, the

responsibility of which shall be personally on the Finance

Officer of the University, by 19th of August, 2011. In case the

same is not so credited, this Court will hold the Finance

Officer of the University liable for contempt for taking a false

stand before this Court.

This application, with the aforesaid direction, is

disposed of.

S.Pandey                     (Navaniti Prasad Singh)