IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 1134 of 2008
1.Ramjeevan Manjhi
2.Arun Manjhi .... Appellants
-- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand .... Respondent
----
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY
----
For the Appellants : M/s A.K.Kashyap, Sr. Advocate,
Sarita Gupta
For the State : A.P.P.
----
08/ 01.07.2011
I.A. No. 1060 of 2011
Heard the counsel for the appellants and the counsel
for the State.
The counsel for the appellants submits that mother of
the victim has stated about the age of the victim that she is
elder than her brother and his (brother of the victim girl’s) age
was eighteen years in the year 2004, therefore, it is obvious that
the victim lady was not minor girl, but a major lady.
From the records, I find that earlier on consideration
of the merits of the case, the prayer for bail of the appellants
was rejected thrice by the Hon’ble Court , and hence, the prayer
for bail of the appellants, is hereby, rejected again at this stage.
Accordingly, the aforesaid Interlocutory application is
disposed of.
( JAYA ROY, J.)
SI/