High Court Kerala High Court

Union Of India Owing Southern … vs Biju on 19 November, 2010

Kerala High Court
Union Of India Owing Southern … vs Biju on 19 November, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 2280 of 2010()


1. UNION OF INDIA OWING SOUTHERN RAILWAY,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. BIJU,S/O.PARAMESWARAN, CHIRANDOTH
                       ...       Respondent

2. SHANMUGHAN.K.N, S/O.NARAYANAN,

3. UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,

4. JOHNSON, S/O.ABRAHAM, CHAMAKKALAYIL

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JAMES KURIAN, SC, RAILWAYS

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI

 Dated :19/11/2010

 O R D E R
              A. K. BASHEER & P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JJ.
              ----------------------------------------------------------
                        C.M.Appln.No.2956 of 2010 &
                          M.A.C.A.No.2280 OF 2010
              ---------------------------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 19th day of November, 2010
                                  JUDGMENT

Basheer, J.

The prayer in this application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation

Act is to condone the delay of 512 days in filing the appeal.

2. The impugned award was passed by the Tribunal on January 22,

2009. But according to the deponent, who is stated to be the Divisional

Railway Manager ( Works), Southern Railway, Thiruvananthapuram,

permission had to be obtained to file the appeal from the head quarters

situated at Chennai, through various departments like Law Branch, Accounts

branch and finally Principal Head of the Department/General Manager.

Thereafter, proposal had to be submitted before the “divisional accounts” for

arranging payment. According to the petitioner, the delay has occurred in the

above circumstances.

Having carefully perused the averments in the affidavit, we are not at all

satisfied with the so called explanation offered for condonation of the

inordinate delay. Therefore, the delay petition is dismissed. Consequently,

the appeal is also dismissed.


                                                 A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE


sv                                           P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JUDGE

sv