High Court Karnataka High Court

National Insurance Co Ltd vs Ajju S/O A John on 29 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
National Insurance Co Ltd vs Ajju S/O A John on 29 January, 2009
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao S.N.Satyanarayana


IN THE HIGH covm 01+’ KARNATMA, Bawagmoiakisj L’

DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUA;e§I,V.A'{2::<)§§ij: T A; "

PRESENT

THE H<3N*I3LE MR.JUSTIQEK.S&R;§'%EDHA.:1%V'%-§§§;§5

AND

THE HONBLE MR. JU%;s;':#t<:E§%s3:§:

; $;xfI"a?.gNARéXAz~:A
M.-F.A.NO51.8,6?VL 1§)€5_3 {MW
BETWEEN H

NATIONAL £NS¥.jR;AE%¥CE i":O_L'~F'_"D¢_ ' V
MA§ATHA§A1<LI'~V:3R;a::s::::i~:-». _ «
THROUGH frs 7R§€2v{}IQ'NAL~m«’:CE
#144, sUB,H;;RAM c:}c3.Is.§”?.:,E:x ‘ ‘
Mi}. ROAi), ‘BANGALORE 5;:-$000:
RE}? 33:’ rrs A2f)_M:,NISTRm*:3z:§: %Z}F’F3ICE1R
SR1 K.K.MALLIi-:_
APPELLANT

.A Q .. (33% sR1fa,<:, SEETHARAMA RAG, ADVOCATE)

mi?) «

V .1 év!R.v1.AJ.;Iti

3/0 A; 301%;

A. , ,AGE{) ABOUT 24 YEARS

, §?:~,fAT NQ166, 13TH CRQSS

‘ ‘RAMESHNAGAR
M:’xR&THAHALLI P033′
BANGALORE ~ 56003?’

‘A ~’é 3 F SOMANATHAN

Mfi..I€}R

4/

is recorded on 31.5.01. which is marked at

RR the vehicie is shown to have caused Z V’ ”

FER also mm;-Jrions that because of petifibnér , T

trtratazent in hospital, the F1}? was not fifA(.2€)’i”-‘dfid

The FIR was recorded when ‘fi1%.”»p¢tit%én€ifVV’ ?z.é:?9.s;.’:’;§I11V:ider
treament The poiice have
fnund that the vehicie in accident.

In Vi€W of the      'ilhfi vehicle:
in question is    The fmding of the

Tribunal in is aTndwp’i’oper.

3. firacture of left ieg I’6S1j,}.{iIig

in amputafiénu “b,eiVdii»*«;_=’ ‘§’.he tatal baciy ciisability is

_VVass&$$€:§;i’ mat. 500/”oV. ‘~._’I’:he petitianer is a elecmcian, ag€& 22

-.y€a1’~s,.,_. In i_:’hE;.:ab’sa=:Vnce of crcdibla inccpme procxf, the §IiCGI11€3 cf

fhé .:VéS’$css€{i at R$=24fifl ;::.m.. The income 3033

pmpoffiionraté disability i$ Rs.120G pm.

A. 3». .Cm”rea13preciation of the facts and evidence, the

“;§’e’.:i;ii{-mégr is cniitled to gsksaoea for pain and ageny,

Rs,55(),GO0 for loss of amenities and éiacomfart, Rs.1,’?§,(}{)0

lump sum is granted far artificial iinzh, it$ fixaticm and its

a?

4
repiacement from time ‘:0 time. The meéical bills are

produced for R$.15,800/~ The petitioner is g’ra::1t_ed

R3.Z£7’,O00 towaxfls medical expenses. Rs. 15008 is

for loss of income Ciuxing laid up-._pcridd,_”””Fh£: 10:T;s

proportionate to disability is Rs. { figcome}
x 12 (months) X 18 (mu1ti.;§ijt§:3. far 3038
of mazfiage prospagts. sntifleé fer
Kata}. compensa:ié¥:.sé .’of agamst Rs.
10,455 25/ – .{‘3E31;¥ipi”E§’::’:1Si’€%i”3ZiO11, the petitioner
is enfit1€c?.’ fCif §féfi3m i::he date sf petitiezz till
the date }3:” ” in éeposit shafi be

transferrcci for paymant. The appeal; is

4′ ‘V A ‘ -. ….. _. v

Sd/~

Judge
Sd/«
Jtzdgé