Abdul Vahid vs S.I.Of Police on 31 March, 2010

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 236 of 2010()


1. ABDUL VAHID, S/O.ALIYARUKUNJU
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. S.I.OF POLICE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.RASHEED C.NOORANAD

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :31/03/2010

 O R D E R
                         V. RAMKUMAR, J.
                     ...................................
                       B.A.No.236 of 2010
                      ..................................
                     Dated:31st March, 2010

                               O R D E R

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner

who is the accused in Crime No.50 of 2010 of Kayamkulam

Police Station for offences punishable under Section 498(A)

I.P.C. seeks anticipatory bail.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled

against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the

nature of the legal injury sustained and the other circumstances

of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the

petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-

charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioner

on bail for a period of one month in the event of his arrest in

connection with the above case on his executing a bond for Rs.

25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent

sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said

officer and subject to the following conditions:

Bail A.No.236/2010 -:2:-

1. The petitioner shall report before the

Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on

all Wednesdays.

2. The petitioner shall make himself available for

interrogation including custodial interrogation as

and when required by the Investigating Officer.

3. Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the

prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to

tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

4. Petitioner shall not commit any offence while

on bail.

5. On the expiry of the aforesaid period, the

Petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate

concerned and seek regular bail.

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above

conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be

cancelled.

This application is allowed as above.

Dated this the 31st day of March, 2010.

V.RAMKUMAR,
JUDGE.

bkn/-