ST': ' IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF EANUARY 2010 BEFORE I THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE K.N.KESHAVANARAYANE1':_.::_ _ CRIMINAL APPEAL N0.592/ZOO:/f~~V..Vv'::.O.:' 4 Between : O Ravindra Raju S/o Ramanujaiah Raju Aged about 37 years, Residing at Old No.938, New No.57, 7 11" 'C' Cross, Vyahkavah BangaJore--S60 O03; ( By Sr}i<.M.,§V!e»:~gxi_V:rv1ou'nOi]'Advocate ) AND: O W 'O J Smt.G.-ayathri C.'-Rajd, -"'.W/o.C%*::aia_pat_hi Raju, ..... Aged 'aho'*ut 3_"/~.y.ears, O _Bangalore_45€~,G"'032. '-Sr; .wK'r&-shnadeyaAa*a---ya Educatéonai T2'--J. s'tO;_ ROo~ya"§« ._Cot'f'ta--g e, Bangafo re Paéa ca, .. Respondent
..By_Sr.i”L.’SrinEvasa Babu, Advocate )
&/’
Thés Criminal Appeal Es fiéed under Section 3?8 (4) of
Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the judgment and order of
acquittal dated 5.12.2006 passed by the xx AcMM.,i&=xxII
ASCJ., Bangalore, in C.C.No.203I6/O4 — acq_,t;_i_tt:iVn’g4,”~;.the
respondent/accused for the offence punishable ugh-der:TS’e’ction
138 of N.I.Act.
This Criminaé Appeaé coming on 7t:0r’lvhea.rjv’rig–.gV
the Court deéivered the foilowin:gwi__V
.l__…….______
&DGMEM:hg
Both Dartiesand their.,te~spect~i,ve.é’i’earn,.ed advocates are
present, The flletl a,.4Vc~onn’p’r0’mése petition under
Section 3147 ‘of7¥t_he_ instruments Act, reporting
settlement;”As’~.pAer,’A~.rfi’e..,:tagrms of the settlement, the
complainant has”‘r’ece’:§;’ed. from the accused a sum of
foil anvclllltinai settéement of his céaim made in
before the teamed Magistrate, Therefore,
it the pa..rtEes’ha\?e sought for disposal of this appeal in terms of
cgomproimise petition. The parties admit the execution of
thegwc-onnpromise and its terms therein. @
In View of the above, compromise petition is accepted.
In the iéght of the compromise petéton, this is
disposed of.
sea,
*bl</