High Court Kerala High Court

The National Termal Power … vs J.Kamalakshy Amma on 18 August, 2009

Kerala High Court
The National Termal Power … vs J.Kamalakshy Amma on 18 August, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

LA.App..No. 1891 of 2002()


1. THE NATIONAL TERMAL POWER CORPORATION
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. J.KAMALAKSHY AMMA, KALATHIL PADITTATHIL,
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.J.JOSEPH

                For Respondent  :DR.P.S.KRISHNA PILLAI

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.SURENDRA MOHAN

 Dated :18/08/2009

 O R D E R
               PIUS C. KURIAKOSE &
              K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.
    ------------------------------------------------
             L. A. A. No.1891 of 2002
    ------------------------------------------------
      Dated this the 18th day of August, 2009

                     JUDGMENT

Pius C. Kuriakose, J

This appeal is preferred by the Requisitioning

Authority and they are aggrieved by the re-fixation of

the market value of the lands under acquisition from

Rs.3050/- per Are to Rs.12000/- per Are.

2. Having regard to the submissions of

Sri.V.J.Joseph, the learned counsel for the appellant

and Sri.P.S.Krishna Pillai, the learned counsel for the

claimant/respondent and Sri.P.N.Sumangala, the

learned Government Pleader, having gone through the

impugned judgment and having made a re-appraisal of

the evidence, we are of the view that the

enhancement granted under the impugned judgment

is slightly excessive. On a better assessment of the

L. A. A. No.1891 of 2002 -2-

market value based on same evidence, the market

value of the property under acquisition can be re-fixed

at Rs.9,000/- per Are. We set aside the judgment and

decree under appeal and re-fix the market value of the

lands under acquisition at Rs.9,000/- per Are.

3. The appeal will stand allowed to the above

extent, but in the circumstances, without any order as

to costs. It is needless to mention that the

respondent/claimant will be entitled for all statutory

benefits on the total enhanced compensation to which

she becomes eligible by virtue of the re-fixation under

this judgment.

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE
JUDGE

K. SURENDRA MOHAN
JUDGE
kns/-