Gujarat High Court High Court

Banvarilal vs State on 4 March, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Banvarilal vs State on 4 March, 2011
Author: Anant S. Dave,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/2689/2011	 3/ 4	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 2689 of 2011
 

 
=========================================================


 

BANVARILAL
SHIVCHARANLAL THAKUR - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
Appearance : 
MR
EKANT G AHUJA for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR AJ DESAI, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for
Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 04/03/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

RULE.

Learned APP – Mr. A.J. Desai waives service of notice of Rule for
the respondent State.

This
application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure in connection with First Information Report registered as
I-C.R. No.44/2011 with Sabarmati Police Station, Ahmedabad for the
offences punishable under Sections 326, 294(b), 323, 279, 114 of
Indian Penal Code and under Section 135(1) of Bombay Police Act.

Learned
Counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that considering the
allegations levelled in the First Information Report and role
attributed to the applicant and by imposing suitable conditions, the
applicant may be enlarged on bail since it may be a case at the most
of manhandling the complainant and nothing beyond that.

Heard
learned APP Mr. AJ Desai for the respondent-State.

Having
heard learned Counsel for the parties and perusing the record of the
case and taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of
allegations, role attributed to the applicant, by imposing suitable
conditions, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the applicant on
bail.

Learned
Counsels for the parties do not press for further reasoned order.

In
the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed
and the applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection
with First Information Report registered as I-C.R. No.44/2011 with
Sabarmati Police Station, Ahmedabad, on executing a bond of
Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) with one surety of the like
amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court and subject to the
conditions that he shall;

a)
not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

b)
not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

c)
surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

d)
not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the
Sessions Judge concerned;

e)
mark presence at the concerned Police Station on the first Sunday of
every month between 10.00 a.m. and 3.00 p.m. for three months only;

f)
furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating
Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond
and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this
Court;

The
authorities will release the applicant only if not required in
connection with any other offence for the time being.

If
breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions
Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate
action in the matter.

Bail
bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to
try the case.

At
the trial, the Trial Court shall not be influenced by the
observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage,
made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

Rule
made absolute. Direct Service is permitted.

Sd/-

(Anant
S. Dave, J.)

Caroline

   

Top