Jagadeesh S S/O C S Subramanyam vs The Commissioner Hindu Religious … on 3 December, 2008

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2008

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOI-IAN RE::5'D1'f:   

WRIT PETITION No.2975 OF' 2QO'6»{-(}M~'_R/:C'l:AE.'V:V     A

BETWEEN

1 JAGADEESH S S/O C S SUB_RA,MAm'A1vIV _   
43 YRS, PARICHARAK  *   -- -'
SR1 CHAMUNDESHWAR1 TEMPLE 
CHAMUNDI HILLS, M_Y~SOR_E _  

(By Sri: S NAOARAJA AND:AOiViKARA..M.UF§TH?;»'ADVS.)

AND:

1 THE "cO'MM:SSiO'RE»R,   
HINDU RELIGEOUS ' 3;. CHARITABLE
ENDOWMENTS MA';.,A1«.MAHDAESHwARA
COMPLEX, ALBERT VICTOR ROAD,
C;H.AMARAJPET; BANGALORE 2

 ,:,"*rHE1v1jERL1*IH'..'COMMISSIONER

1. VMYSORE'A_N.1).~~ADM1NSTRATOR OF SR1
'- SCHAMUNjDE:SHARI TEMPLE CHAMUNDI HILLS
MYSORE; 41-0

"  THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER

V.  A  CHAMUNDESHWARI TEMPLE
A'  * CHAMUNDI TEMPLE, MYSORE 10

  _ N LALITHAMMA

' D / O LATE NARAYANAPPA'

1'  'PETITIONER.

 



iVVSeShadi'i*;«.__ On' tilieiideath of Ramanna, the said two Sons
 theu?aricharak rights for a period of six months
 eargih.-_ Vefigkatasubbaiah had two sons by names Subbaraya

"e.VianE1_y]§arayanappa and on the death of Venkatasubbaiah, the

63 YRS
R/O THOTADAMANE, DEVIKERE ROAD
CHAMUNDI HILLS, MYSORE IO

5 N ANNAPURANAMMA

D /O LATE NARAYANAPPA

61 YRS

R/O THOTADAMANE3, DEVIKERE ROAD

CHAMUNDI HILLS, .--  -- ..     »

MYSORE 10.   .1; RE'SPQNDEQN'I"S.'.w 
(By Sri: VEERAPPA, AGA FOR R1--3,

SR1. NB. EHAT, ADV. FOR R4 8s'RS,
SRI. DIWAKAR, ADV. FOR c/R4 aa__R5)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILE-D.UN'D.ER ARTH:.LES 226
AND 227 OF' THE cONST.IfIUTII'_)N:. O'1«V__II\I1:~IA PRAYING TO
QUASH ANN--J THE ORDER iD'F.13vf.2.2006_i_ PASSED BY THE
R: IN PROCEEDINGS NOADM,r.7,'vRI226;7'O%5:Og3_. 

THIS PETI<rI'O':s:;" ' COIMING': ON  RENAL HEARING,
THIS DAY THE'CO.U}€1Tf'IVIAQE '*THE."I'+-OLLOWING:

    
Sri.;Cha:I1u1;Idesi'iVsIari'V'Te_Tnpie at Mysore is a Muzarai

iiistitutioh Of Wh.i_ch the original Paricharak was one

Ramen1'2.a wh.O:"VhadftwO sons by name Venkatasubbaiah and

M

 



4
Respondents 4 and 5 were entitled to the same rights for the

period from 1st January to 315′ March of every year.

3. The challenge to the order Annexure~”J’jw_ii::V r1’t§=;’

opinion is without merit and the writ petition is aC’eg:’irc’:i1’gV1t’y’L =

rejected.