El
II
RIO HIFEEEHALEJI KOPPAL VILLAGE
K:%SABA HOBLJ HOLENARAS§PUR£§ffi’9;1l}¥{‘ ” ‘
HASSAN DI STRICT
R’fiJ EGQW DA
S,/O LATE KARIYAPPA GUWDA
MAJOR
Rfii} HIREHALLE I{(f}PPAL VILL;A,C}E __ . -~
KAS£BA HOBLI H0LENARASiPI;;r:a%A-3_fALU1< ~ _
HASSAN 91$f'RIC'£', * ' "
MAJ SF?
we HiRE;E{AE’1.;Li
;«:R;sHNF, Gowua __
we LATE i«;gR:’iAPPA_ QQWDA
‘KGPFAL V.
KASABA.-H’»’7)B{.I_ I§0LENz’§RfiS–EFL¥i?£ TALUK
HASSAN I::;:Fs’2f1é:c;=’;’ . x
T815 Lamijj;-:fRiéi:JNA*z=»
Ht?LENAR;éu~3¥.PU’i%A
:~1<,:–LE;~m1'sAs;';?::.s2A»T.
"1'£§.3';;U_}{ _ _'
I»a;as:?{;s.1~:' £)1SEfRi£:'F .,
E%?EPRESE?~3'FE:'}_ E3?
SESRETARY V .,
_ 4, gay ié-znfi: R S R’
vlfl
F};
I33ESPCiNDE}N’TiS}
‘ADV. FOR’ R-1 T 4 AND SEE BASAVARAJ
§§iA§§E£>DY,:$3.A’;«.§’OR Qua)
fittiiii
APPEAL :3 FEED 1.1/8 4 OF’ THE KA’z¥NA’1’AKA
. ‘ HIGH <;c3;j:::T MLT mmmc; TE') SET saslm THE @2332 PASSED EN
A WW1' PETITION NC3.320(}9,e'20{)2 BIKTED 01/0612904,
TEES APPEf&L COMING GN 'E3639 HEARING THEE'; DAY,
1' I3IEE?AK VERMAJ. DELIVERED THE: FOLLOWENG:
"%
35-
Not only fiaisfio asccfiam from the judgment on _
was placcd by 1631-med Single Judge, we have triizfij
whethcr in that case Rule 194%. sf fiig
Bat unforiunateiy, the said qzitatiexzy IL¥«?”.1vS’§’81
wrcmg, which deals with Secfiofié’ Mater
Vehicles Act with zzzgazxiifce has no
appiicatien at all the Land
Refozms Act, 1963
6. wt: thceugllt that the
same que$fiéfi”<;z§§1 Tribunal itself and the
appenam Qmgigi b1~§1§gT1%£;«::_o'} gfiaéc 9fT:ribuna1, that nothing
930" is .1"€€iT¥»15é""t3*é3% 10.,'-"'¥? mcause Rule 194; in the Rulcs
" ':iQcs cgfisi pr €\;tiiz1vt§3.r:«jucigcncnt 9f the High Court relied on
tiié Judge does not éeai with the provisions
V of R11i¢"wf£9–.)§,'&–.V-"?iT
H counsc} for appaflant contcnécd that in any
V' ?;.f:z.$é,"°Lh;: Tribunal cannet sit as an Appellate Court over
K -.f11:§ j}¥{i@ent passcd by learned Single Judge and it may find it
T ~[;iiii'fi;:u1t to deal with this question.
I
U!
8. Thus, looking to the matter from all V’
the apinien that the impugzcd order bf u
Single Judge {cannot be su:$£an1′ mi A’ ‘TW§:é”t§;av§:
assiged the I’Ca30I}S as Rule z;ot.V;éS€’gsf’.. “anc§’: tbs: ” L’
judgment said 1:0 be cicaling hcfif’ ‘Rvt13€VA-3E§}–i& and
relied upon by the 1::axncc§’_:;:ot match with
tbs facts «of the? .. = ‘ ” .
9. As sag ta be remanded to
lcanzed §v’rit petition fikzd by
respundc}{;t$ be hazard afresh on merits, in
accordancfi V H
” ;§’1I1Ofli:»ft1_; (jv’j§:>ti(V’)I:: that came to am mind was that
V. be granted yermission to file an apgralicafion
passed by Icalncd Singic Judge but WE
_ havé”<«not:;ii' leameei Single Judge, who had passed thc
fiiirifir, Esincc clcmitted tht: ofice, which would furlzhcr cause
the maitcr. For this mama, the imyugucd Grdcr
VA by the learned. Single Judge is hereby sci aside: and
quashttd. In the facts and cirtumstances of the case, we pass
the following :.n'dcr:~–
33
I’!
The office is directed to pieces: the IIla’lIt£31;”.:_?§:’;}C1Tw{?¥7t:§V H
appropriatr: Eench aficr 15 days h€I’€Qf, ‘Ai9c:’i1cr:§:i1::%.g
learned counsel who have appeared
wcsuld then consider the cm. in .
accordance with Jiaw. VV ‘ V
Thc appeal stands . {§xtcnt mentiancd
lixttrcin above but 790 3 ~ L ”
35/?
Iudgé
sazag
mg;
‘?.4ivss= V