* ‘5″-” * fvyn: ur KARNATAKA i-HGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH t
IF! THE HIGH CCIURT cap KARNATAKA AT i %
mrmn ms mm mm my on aamam 200’? ff ‘ _
BEFORE
TI-IE Hoxma MR..JUs’1IcE
BETWEEN:
Siolatze SriH.DanarathaiahV–.j:= _ ‘
Agedabaut42yae.;m.._V
Qhallabnre . ‘
~
2. S.P.J11bmf. ,
abautE 4_7 _____ ..
V§3l11’&’-‘a£1.u1’ga.§ ….PE1rm0HERs
_ & Raga, AcIv.,}
‘ Fiétam afKar.namh
‘ * ~-Re;neumt§d by T’}mlakPcs1ix:e
Repmescntad by Sta.tePubIi<: Proaecuttr
O}'¢.Adv-ocata Gwalof
Kazrnamlm, High Courtfiuildixags
Bangabre- 560 091.
(By Sri B.Ba.1a1<r'nhna, HCGP)
…RES%H1')ENT
nm criminal pflzitimzx is filed 1;1}'a.'¥827'.–4_""»*"§'-:'1_"–.»I:-"'.«£.,'.f.'.
pmym ' to quash the order damd L' é
mngrxzmnae against the peztitinnmu in .£3r.Np'.§"2f
(C..C.Ro..2'3'5!Dfi) an tlm 5112 of the 2
and the mfim pmceeadiny in Sphflzzsaa
file: of the Add1.S.J., {:1-muac1ur9:a%i»a:%:,;1%%
This petiticn oam1ng'
Caurt made the fixsllowitg:
The :m..2 and 3 £31
Spl. Cam; trial far ofieaues
and 506 rfw. 34 IPC
and aim & 3’1′ Pretnantinn cf
‘am, Mm the file af the smm and
Chit:-adurga have filod t}:1’w patition ta
* ‘A 2. 111%): hmrd Sri H.KantLh.a.raja, lnarrmd Counaei
&;g+%% and Iaarxzad aoummnz Ad-uocate for the
h I have bean talem tlmaugh the rworcis.
nun I \-0’-l’\lI\I \.rI I\l”lI\I’Il”Ill”‘\I\uf”‘\ TIIIJI1 1.11′ l\.l\l\I’I-III-IR!’ I’lI\7I”I LUUKI U!” {
3, As per awash of fnfat mfarmthn and
sminmanta. ofwitfiaes, there wag certain c
bemaen second accused D.SudhaJmr and
Kumar.
On7.2.1997 du1’mg’ ev’aI1fl”‘;z€.”x Z
um: cwa.1 to 5 m diatifiery na’.:;
Giran1’Cmaa.CW-7e11te.:redV WV.
was a quarrel and amused Nc.1 and 2 to 3 necked mt cw-'3 of aid
dintillcry. accused 130.3 as
to anmzsed 1605.1 tn 3
abused 1* but mm of thw caatna
and lives. Tmfi, cw-
._ _ ‘ ….. than. . ®afi9n* a figal
repo1’* agamt petitiaxwra mid firs:
a.:::::1zs_ [since d£C%6d) far the afioresaxfi
learned Mafimm wok ‘ of
fl ” mtmmitmd the was is the Court: of €=pec3a1’
‘ . V _ Judge at Chitradurga.
4. Sri Kantharaju, firnzd Counsel Eur petifiag
…1…..-…-um-u nw.-r1 LA’\AJLl._:Kl OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNAYAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COLIRT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C
has made fanowzm aubmiaaianafi WA! 1
is treated as the Court of original jurisdiction:
cagzzkmrne of oflencaa.
7′. I hava ham). takax
submitted under Sectinn 1?3z§) CEEC, A
3. Section 14 cups efiect
fmm 30.9.2003. Thu cauld take
cogr%’ an a cnurt of
original mcctzrranae had takm
arm mama
Counsal rm learned Magistrate did
‘ …..
H ” narration of facm fauna! in ms: firs:
the staiaemntpi af wimaaaea, the
. fa13~e€3′ by awcnnd amused that has had not
abused complainant afi ot1’1m- accuwd
puibfic vim: mum»: be acceptud. fin oz;-mzrrmae
.. ……… .. …….mmm rm.-rrl :.;qu,_;<r or KARNATAKA I-ISGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH count or KARNATAKA men COURT or mxmuam ruurs :.
had taken piacewizhinpuhlic vimsr. 'I'1:ne&re, it cannot
be said that avm-manta of firm', irxfozfmagion and