High Court Kerala High Court

Sathyan Memorial Arts & Sports … vs State Of Kerala on 21 June, 2007

Kerala High Court
Sathyan Memorial Arts & Sports … vs State Of Kerala on 21 June, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 8212 of 2007(S)


1. SATHYAN MEMORIAL ARTS & SPORTS CLUB
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SHAMSUDHEEN, A.S.MANZIL,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE REGISTRATION INSPECTOR GENERAL,

3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR,

4. THE SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE,

5. KOTTAMKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.RAJENDRAN

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :21/06/2007

 O R D E R
                      H.L. DATTU, C.J. &  K.T. SANKARAN, J.

                         ...................................................................................

                                   W.P( C)No.  8212  OF  2007

                  ...................................................................................

                                 Dated this the   21st June, 2007


                                            J U D G M E N T

H.L. Dattu, C.J.:

The first petitioner is a cultural organization registered under the

provisions of the Travancore Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable

Societies Registration Act. The second petitioner is an active member of

the first petitioner Society and also a public spirited citizen.

2. It is stated in the petition that the second petitioner had

surrendered his valuable immovable property to the State Government for

the purpose of construction of the Sub Registrar office, Kilikolloor. The

State Government has not taken any effective steps for the said

construction. Therefore, the petitioners are before us for a direction to

the respondents to take immediate steps for the construction of the Sub

Registrar Office, Kilikolloor in the property surrendered by the second

petitioner.

3. Learned Government Pleader was directed to get instruction

W.P( C)No. 8212 OF 2007

2

from the respondents. The respondents have filed a detailed statement

of objections . In the said statement of objections, they have stated that

they are not interested in the property surrendered by the second

petitioner. In fact, they want to take the property belongs to the Kollam

Corporation, since it is more suitable for the construction of the Sub

Registrar office, Kilikolloor.

4. We cannot direct the State Government to accept the land

offered by a private citizen for the purpose of construction of the Sub

Registrar Office. It is left to the choice of the State Government, either

to accept the offer or not to accept the offer. In the matters of this

nature, no mandamus can be issued.

5. Therefore, the reliefs sought for in this Writ Petition cannot be

granted. Accordingly, the Writ Petition requires to be rejected and it is

rejected.

6. The petitioners may make appropriate application before the

State Government to reconvey the property to the second petitioner. If

and when such an application is made, the State Government will take

effective steps to reconvey the property to the second petitioner, as early

W.P( C)No. 8212 OF 2007

3

as possible.

Ordered accordingly.

H.L. DATTU,

CHIEF JUSTICE.

K.T. SANKARAN,

JUDGE.

lk