High Court Kerala High Court

Shajeer vs The Calicut University on 4 April, 2008

Kerala High Court
Shajeer vs The Calicut University on 4 April, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 11624 of 2008(H)


1. SHAJEER, S/O. MAHMOOD V.V.
                      ...  Petitioner
2. JASEELA K.V.

                        Vs



1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS

                For Petitioner  :SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :04/04/2008

 O R D E R
                         ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
             ------------------------------------
                   W.P.(C) 11624 & 11629 of 2008
             -------------------------------------
                         Dated: APRIL 4, 2008

                              JUDGMENT

The 1st Petitioner in WP(C) 11624/08 has submitted Ext.P1

application seeking revaluation of one of the papers of the 4th

semester and the 2nd petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 seeking

revaluation of two papers of the 5th semester B.Tech. course. they

are undergoing in the MES College of Engineering, Kuttippuram.

2. Similarly the 1st petitioner in WP(C) 11629/08 has

submitted Ext.P1 application seeking revaluation of three papers of

the 5th semester B.Tech. course and the 2nd petitioner therein has

submitted Ext.P2 seeking revaluation of two papers of the 5th

semester B.Tech. Course which they are undergoing at the

N.S.S.College of Engineering, Palakkad.

3. The common complaint of the petitioners is that there has

not been any progress in the matter of revaluation and hence these

writ petitions are for expediting the process.

4. In view of the fact that they have already applied for

WP(C) 11624 & 11629 of 2008
Page numbers

revaluation as mentioned above, these writ petitions are disposed of

directing that if the applications have been received and they are

otherwise in order, the revaluation shall be completed and results

declared as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight

weeks of production of a copy of this judgment.

Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment before the

respondents for compliance.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE

mt/-