The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs The New India Assurance Co Ltd on 22 October, 2008

 NEW Emma AssuRm{iE"¢bMPANY LIMITED
'-:>.o.Na.1, 2f**Emo$a

  BANGALQRE  5e}Q..--oo2 ...REsPoNm-«H

& 4"I,;l;..'§sC'¥;. 1963., ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 11.10.2966 ?ASSED IN

 ETA MjO.3,485/BANGIZODS AND CGRRIGENDUM DATES 20.11.2006 FOR
 ASSESSMENT YEAR 1999-2008, PRAYING T0 FORMULATE THE

_ T -,Si.iBSTANTIAi.. QUESTIONS OF LAW STATES THEREIN AND TO ALLOW
 HXPPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN ETA ¥~éO.1485/BANGIZOOS, DATED

IN THE HIGH coupcr or-' KAaNAm<A AT BANGALORE

99.750 was THE 22"'° war or ocrcasa 2003

PRESENT  T%
THE HON'BLE MR.3us1Ic:r.-: a<.sREEoHAR RA9
AND   ff? ; T T:
THE E-i0N'BLE MR.JUS'I"ICE C.R.KUMARA_.5%»JA3d':("~.::: 

INCOME TAX APPEAL M1253 arms  %    T 7

EEK;

c R suxmzwcs 
QUEENS 3r:.A1:'~._ 1 ._
BANGALORE ,- *

1 THE commxsszzjafnea   V' '  VV

2 THE  
WARD--15(3}'.-      :
BANGALOREV *  '   ~ ...APPELLANTS

(av sax V 

mks;-5M1'   
opp. . Vfiiffl.  _¥~¥O.SP'iTAi.
K.R.RL'JAD -- ~ 
(av  MVJAVALLAIBVOCATE) '

 AA  INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260'»!-'s OF

'i'HE APPEAL AND SE? ASIDE THE ORDER 1'-MSSED BY THE INCOMETAX
11.10.2006

AND CORRIGENDUM DATEI) 29.11.2006 AND CONFIRM THE

<:%/

2
ORDER OF THE APPEUATE COMMISSIONER AND THE ZNCOME TAX
OFFICER (TBS), WARD 16(3), BANGALORE.

THIS ENCOME TAX AP9EAL COMENG {DN FOR HEARING THISDAY,
K. SREEDHAR RAD, J… DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

J_!_1…D._§.B.§_.P.!_’_I.’

sri.M.V.JavaIi takes notice for the respondosfigod ‘:–df: ‘

I.A.2/2008 is auowed. The way 2ds3Jddcsa ys;:z§

the Appeal is condoned.

The sub$ta”fit.ioA:.:’..qg§és§i§o_o “!”ava:?Lt_:inVF:oIved in this apnea!
is no more has been decided in
favour of:i;_!_1e’- ».I44§”‘i*,«.1::I:5;;:jo;245/2008 and other batch

of cases. I:i\d4gg”:mo’ o’f’A§;he’:_’j’udgment rendered in the said

rose, ‘VA;-graze! disQ9$ed of.

Sd/-..

Judge

Sd/-.

Judge