High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Dr.Akhilesh Kumar Jaiswal vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 February, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Dr.Akhilesh Kumar Jaiswal vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 February, 2011
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                       CWJC No.11583 of 2006

Dr. Akhilesh Kumar Jaiswal, son of Sri Hari Narain Jaiswal, residentr of 20/1, Awas Vikas
Colony Rauza, Ghazipur, Dist. Ghazipur, presently posted as Lecturer, Department of Medicine
(Kaya Chikitsa), Govt. Ayodhaya Shiv Kumari Ayurvedic College, Begusarai - Petitioner.
                                            Vs.
   (1) The State of Bihar,
   (2) The Secretary, Department of Medicine Education, Family Welfare & Indigenous
       Medicine, Bihar, Patna.
   (3) The Dy. Secretary, Department of Medicine Education, Family Welfare & Indigenous
       Medicine, Bihar, Patna.
   (4) The Director, Indigenous Medicine, Bihar, Patna - Respondents.



6       28.2.2011

The petitioner was initially appointed as a Medical

Officer and in terms of the Government decision that all those

medical officers holding post graduate degree should be promoted

to the post of lecturer, the petitioner was appointed as a lecturer in

the subject of Medicine (Kaya Chikitsa) on 16.5.1997.

The grievance of the petitioner is that although he is

duly qualified and has worked for several years as a lecturer, he is

not being considered for promotion to the post of Reader on the

ground that there is no vacancy in the subject of Medicine.

Counsel for the petitioner refers to Annexure 5 which

is a resolution of the State Government dated 18.6.1991. Relying

on clause (Ga), it is submitted that there is a provision that in

certain subjects / specialty in case post graduate degree holders are

not available, the post graduate degree holders of the specified

categories shall be eligible for promotion / appointment on the

higher post.

The State counsel submits that besides the petitioner

perhaps five others who possess the qualification in the
2

Department of Medicine are senior to the petitioner. The petitioner

contends that his seniority has wrongly been calculated on the

basis of his date of joining. It is the claim of the petitioner that he

joined on 29.5.1997, whereas his joining is said to be on 3.6.1997.

The State counsel relies on Annexure 1 whereas the petitioner

relies on Annexures 4 and 4/1 to indicate that the date of joining

was 29.5.1997.

In the circumstances respondent Secretary,

Department of Medical Education, Family Welfare and Indigenous

Medicine, Bihar shall call for a report from the concerned colleges

and thereafter decide the inter se seniority of all those candidates

who have been appointed as lecturer along with the petitioner. I

may clarify here that the date of joining cannot be the sole factor

for fixation of seniority as it may be the case that from the date of

notification of promotion / appointment as a lecturer, certain

incumbents may be in a position to join earlier, whereas others

may be posted at some distance from the post allotted to them as

lecturer and, therefore, require certain amount of travelling time

before they can submit their joining. All these facts are to be taken

into consideration before deciding the issue. Respondent Secretary

should also notice all concerned persons in the Medicine

Department, in case respondent Secretary finds that the petitioner

is entitled for consideration for promotion to the post of Reader,

appropriate orders may be issued.

The petitioner may accordingly file a representation

before respondent Secretary of the department along with a copy
3

of this order within six weeks. The matter may be decided on valid

service of notice to the lecturers in the Department of Medicine

within six months thereafter.

This writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid

observations and directions.

haque                                        ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)