High Court Karnataka High Court

Shankar Yellappa Badni S/O … vs The Chief Of The Army Staff on 17 April, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Shankar Yellappa Badni S/O … vs The Chief Of The Army Staff on 17 April, 2009
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
 i

; 1303': MAME,

WP No.288'?[2008

IN 'ma men COURT 0? KARNA'I'AKA_.  ' 'V "  T. 3
cmcurr BENCH AT DHARWA13. H    V 
DATED was trim 192" mm? 6F'Asgm.2oe)§«[. : 
mom     
THE HON'BLB    7'    
  

SHANKAR YE1.1.APPA.Bi)$DN£.A--}..V 1  '
SlOYELLAPPA_   
AGEBABGU'£4§}YEAR$   "
woarcmc; ASNABE :=:fuBmAR. 
NO.11$."fi%FBNV-(IA), " "
Ci056APO;g    «_ 1
   
2: FAD,TA}+¥AN'I'}i"Iw¥AG~Di3T12l'C'I',

s.f.rAT_EOF  j

No.1 15,"1NmN,'f 

~ 4-:R;<5 2-;ro.3344',' HQSPEZ',
"  GQJELEGALLL

aQ1<A:<_59_; 307. ...PETrr1oNm

I " ADV.)

TEE 'mm or-' mm ARMY STAFF

..  902:3 ARMYH .,
 Q

' '  ADDITIONAL DIREC'£'ORA'I'E GENERAL

{ADGIT TA) 3 ARMY HQ",
NEW DELHI

THE C03'efi\/EANQING OFFICR,
N01 35 INF BN (TA) MAEIAR-934315,



WP 1530.288?/2008

PORT BELGAUM,

4. THEGROU? comamnm,  , ,
TAGPHQSOUT}%CO!vIh1ANI),"'"'m     

(BY Sm.S.N.  cesc)

PETITIONER FROM VDISCPDKRGHVG-« ms Bums AN?)
RESPONSIBII.I'i'IES AS mzsuoa = _COI~;MsLs1QNER OFFICER AND
wrraovr SERVICE OF ANY oRDERicoa»1MauN1c:;x.I;{oN RELATING TO
HIS voLUN'rARY._ BISCPA.'%GE 'IS my FASSED BY um
RESPONDENTS, ._A3.fl.LBGfiiL   ETC,

ms c0:.«fiG’ GN ‘§’0 R_’ MY HEARING 32¢
‘B’ GROUP, 1:315 13%, c;ou;z_1~ rim FOLLOWING:

…. .. V ‘

1. The ;maagesA;m in Indian Army. The case

of the _rcsp«Vfi)i1dci1tsVis ‘(Sn an application given by him he

Q_ W33″ A copy of the application is

at Annexurc-R1. The same is seriously

§1is.;§u:mi i%3rj%tl¢%%Vpe-six-ioner. It is submitlxed by him that

V VV _ appiiitatiiixi d1sc’ hargc was given under coercion. This is

Vflézlcg seriously disputed by the respondents. it is aiso

some allegations are made by the petitioner

agg.-aiuinst the respondents in the Writ petition which are

by filing statenzant ofob_§cc1:ions.

WP No.2887[Q008

: 3 :

2. Rciterating all these facts, the petitioner has given

representations coyies of which are produced at Annc.:hues-

A, B and E. Mr.C.R.Goulay, learned

petitioner submits that he would be satisfied

issued to the respondents

nepmscxztations.

3. Without gairzg into the of made VV

by the petitioner and” ‘#nfi_§fi1®nS « by the

mspomieéttis, a to the respondents that

would _éravvds2 ofv H

4. ;’CQnsc¥1u£_n’ti3.f, the jégaiuou stands d1spo’ sec! of dimcting

. “th’;’:x._ A”;téépoi)£lficnts consider the representations at

E expeditiously.

sai-

JUDGE

Jml –