High Court Kerala High Court

V.N.Sasankan Nair vs The Kerala State Civil Supplies on 5 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
V.N.Sasankan Nair vs The Kerala State Civil Supplies on 5 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 31234 of 2009(Y)


1. V.N.SASANKAN NAIR, S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,

3. THE JUNIOR MANAGER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.S.MANILAL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :05/11/2009

 O R D E R
                        ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                   -------------------------
                     W.P.(C.) No.31234 of 2009
             ---------------------------------
           Dated, this the 5th day of November, 2009

                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P1

order dated 22/09/2009, by which, he has been called upon to

remit an amount of Rs.65,405.68. It is stated that thereupon he has

filed Ext.P2 representation before the 2nd respondent, and that the

matter is pending consideration. According to him, in the

meanwhile, there is threat of recovery pursuant to Ext.P1, and it is

therefore, this writ petition is filed.

2. The learned standing counsel has entered appearance on

behalf of respondents 1 & 2. On instructions, he submit that Ext.P1

issued by the 3rd respondent is intended only as a show cause

notice, and that in response thereof, the petitioner has already

submitted his explanation. It is stated that the matter will be

considered and a final decision thereon will be taken.

3. Having regard to the submission thus made on behalf of

the respondents, I feel the apprehension of the petitioner is

WP(C) No.31234/2009
-2-

unfounded, since Ext.P1, though capable of being understood as an

order, is treated only as a show cause notice.

4. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the

following directions:-

That Ext.P1 will be treated as a show cause notice as submitted, and

the matter will be considered by the 2nd respondent, taking into

account the explanation offered by the petitioner and Ext.P2. It is

directed that until a decision is taken on Ext.P1 as directed above,

recovery pursuant to Ext.P1 shall not be effected.

The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along

with a copy of this writ petition, before the 2nd respondent for

compliance.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
jg