High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri N Rajendra S/O H Narayana Rao vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri N Rajendra S/O H Narayana Rao vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 June, 2008
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, *7  é '

..1..

DATED THIS THE 5th DAY c:F»'JLINE:;é_oo a"     

BEFORE

THE }-ION'BLE MR.JUSTI(iEv:,:R;3M  Izriiijijv 

WRIT PETITION Nwt ;1775L"dE«*'é2x007 (Lfi'--R*E§j

BETWEEN     '

1

mp"

SR1 N RA,jiEN:i:RA s,"0'H NARAYANKRAO
AGEDA42 ?EA'R':1'{,QCC_:--CI'J}_L_EE*l{GINEER,
R/AT.NO,1'3 1:3] 13,'I'vL.E;vS.COLLQNY,
HUNSUR ToW?a;,MYsoRE I3i'$RIC1'I'.

Sm S'UN1"I.'HA.:'i3Ai»j.VVITQ' N RAJENDRA
AGED;35 YEA_RS,R 15$. 1313/ 13,
N.E.S.CQLQNY,HU_NSLIR TOWN,
MYSORE" n,IsTR'1C1*.

A "~SRI3-.SHIVASHAM£§ULINGAPPA
f ~ Si 0 PATEL SANGAPPA
" _.AG13'Q;45' YE_ARS,R/AT.CHANNASOGE VILLAGE,
~. ' --EiAN(}(3'DU;; HOBLLHUNSUR TQ,
' ._MYSO.RE_ DIS'I'RIC'I'.

SR1 SOMACHANBRA S] O P C}-IAMI

n ;  _AGl"3'D:4S YEARS, R] AT. ILYEDATHORE VILLAGE,

KASABA i-IOBLI,H.D.KO'ITE TQ,

 "i'vIYSORE DISTRICT.

SMT B M RATHNAMMA W / O R T CHANNAVEERAPPA
AGED:4O YEARS,R/AT. 1813/ 13,
N.E.S.C1OLONY,HUNSUR TQ,

MYSORE DISTRICI'.  PE'I'ITIQNERS.

M



-2-

(By Sri. B S NAGARAJ, ADV.)
AND:   

1 THE STATE OF' KARNATAKA
RERBY ITS SECRETARY,'  ._ ~  
DEP'I'.OF MUNICIPAL ADD/iii§IiflRATiQN',  
M.S.BU!LDING,DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDH1, '_ " ' '
BANGALORE.  _   *

2 THE DEPUTY c0MMiSszor:_ER 1   
M"YSORED1S'I'RIC'I'. - _  i  '
MYSORE.   '

3 THE TOWN'-.,ML1ijNI_CiPALlTY  13. A
HUNSUR,RE'P,BY'!TS"CH1EF,OFI?l€:ER,
HUNSUR;MYSQ,RE ryisfrmczf, 

4 THE MYS6R:<*:V£)_iS*rR:§j'r...v.*Ar;R BOARD
REPIBY" ITS SECRETARY, 
NEW SAYYAJIHRAO' ROAD,

MYSORE'~y21*. V   RESPONDENTS.

– {By S:i;§’A:RA_MESH B§”‘AN.NAPPANAVAR, AGA

FOR R1 532, M; S. MP. ASSOCIATES, ADV. FOR R3,

s.R1.,_AN:}R;:wHA, ADV. FOR R4)

H – AVi*RIS”‘vu9§R ISVVFILED UNDER ARTICLES 225 35 227 OF

THE C£)NST¥”l’_U_’.i”ION 012 iNDIA PRAYING T0 QUASH THE

RESOLUTION SUBJECT NO. 51 DT. 28.12.2006 MADE IN

~ ‘4.REFEREN’CE:’PASSED BY THE TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,
.vV&”!-I.iJV.N’r’3L’..R CANCELLING THE KATH NC). 1333/25;; TO
=.183_3,f_25;9 MEASURING 22 GUNTAS IN RESPECI’ OF 9

.S_ITIE3-S ‘A COPY SUBMITTED AT ANX-A AND THE

–ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R3 TOWN MUNICIPAL

– » COUNCIL IN REFERENCE 131*. 15.6.2007 COPY SUSMITTS
._ _,zyr ANX—B. H’

VJ

-3-

THIS wan’ PETITION COMING ore FOR Paeigimibijiiéft : 4_
HEARING (B-GROUP) THIS DAY, me COUR1f..MADE’=TH.E _” ‘

FOLLOWING: v.:

9.3_QE5_..R _ _

The petitioners having
of immovable property tam
No. 1833/25 belonging to Bhat and
Padmakshi ]3hat,. of the
properties; Municipal
Council, dt. 28.12.2006
AImexur§.”A ‘Z: of the petitioners’

application} was eomiriunicated to the petitioners

3b’y._Aend:o’i”seInent 15;’6§2007 Axmexure-B. Hence, this

fivfiteizééfifioniét’

reading of the resolution Annexure-A,

V the pefitioners were not extended an

of hearing before passing the resolution

‘ A their claim of transfer of khata. 3″‘ respondent

was obliged to make available to the petitioners the
2′

f
v.3 J’ \

-4-

various communications received by it from eififliexfitiese. * ”

as well as the claim put-forth by ‘V

of Waki’ over the said as”

enable the petitioners to
statement. In the abse.1_1’ce;of fix;

extended to the    resolution
AnI1exure--A nor'   are

sustain' able.  

In jibe. 1*eeLi}i;;-.V ‘petition is allowed. The

impugned re:-3o11;tio:1.’il.?f_1te:i:_i’_.’e~2″8. 12.2006 Annexure-A and

o_oo¢;,e (v;e.§q;;’;1iv11i311icau1l:imiVV___(i_.f-ii;ed 15.6.2007 Aimexure-B are

A”Vqua;,Sb,ed.. «l.3ré:A”1*e$pondent is directed to consider the

the petitioners and pass orders

‘ ‘thereon in accordance with law and in the light

of~f.i1e”obserVa1ions made supra.

Sfiiéi
Ln.