High Court Kerala High Court

Ambily.S vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 25 June, 2008

Kerala High Court
Ambily.S vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 25 June, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 4054 of 2004(G)


1. AMBILY.S.,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,

3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,

4. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

5. MANAGER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.BENOY THOMAS

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN

 Dated :25/06/2008

 O R D E R
        C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & V.K.MOHANAN, JJ.
                        -------------------------
                      WP(C) No. 4054 of 2004
                    ---------------------------------
              Dated, this the 25th day of June, 2008

                           J U D G M E N T

Ramachandran Nair, J.

Petitioner was appointed as High School Assistant to teach

Mathematics in the 5th respondent’s School on a vacancy arising on

account of shifting of one Smt.Radhamony to Higher Secondary

section of the same school. Regularisation of petitioner’s

appointment was withheld on account of delay in regularisation of

appointment of the said Smt.Radhamony. In other words, the post

to which the petitioner was appointed becomes a regular vacancy

only when the said Smt.Radhamony is regularised in the higher

secondary section of the school. The impugned orders are passed

at a time when Smt.Radhamony’s service was not regularised, with

effect from the date on which petitioner joined. However, learned

counsel for the petitioner submitted that later Ms.Radhamani’s

service is regularised with effect from the date on which she was

promoted, that is when petitioner joined duty. Consequently,

petitioner is entitled to regularisation on the date on which she was

absorbed. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with

WP(C) No.4054/2004
-2-

direction to 4th respondent to pass appropriate orders, based on

subsequent developments i.e. regularisation of Ms.Radhamani’s

promotion in the higher secondary section, with retrospective effect

and petitioner will be given consequential benefit without any delay.

(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE)

(V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE)

jg

WP(C) No.4054/2004
-3-