Krishankant @ Pintu vs State on 22 July, 2009

                            // 1 //

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
         AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR

                     ORDER
                       In
   S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.
                   3318/2009
        {Krishankant @ Pintu Versus The
        State of Rajasthan}

       Date of Order ::: 22nd July, 2009

                    PRESENT
   HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN

Shri Mukesh Patodia, counsel for the petitioner
Shri Anil Joshi, PP for the State of Rajasthan
                      ####

By the Court:

The learned counsel for the petitioner

contended that offence under Section 379 IPC is

triable by Magistrate, therefore, application

for bail of the petitioner be considered.

The learned PP contended that

petitioner is habitual offender as seven other

cases are pending against him, which is clear

from para 6 of the order dated 10th April, 2009

passed by the Sessions Judge, Bhilwara.

I have considered the submissions of

learned counsel for both the parties and in

view of all the facts and circumstances of the

case, I am not inclined to allow this bail

application and the same is, accordingly,

dismissed.

(NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J.

// 2 //

//DK//