EN THE men (10913? 01? l{}&i%N§¥I’A}iA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA;’_:””‘ ‘ ; –%.:
DATED ‘§’HI.’:’-‘> THE 18TH BAY gap A{}(J{;’»S?If~:;§G£§8<- _ ,4 "
BEFORBi't___
THE §-10m'~3LE MR.V;}'i§$TI{§}13.. H.B}LJ}§&PPAV :1
M.}"§._A.No. 1429/23.30? ~ T %
BETWEEN:
Niranjar: 5/0. _ _ . A,
Kamaiakar Rae' {Mah1i:rkai';"V V.
Aged 35 yg-=:;13~'2:~,__ 'lj_
C}C(EI{3{}i1€1″.’}.££:fL;3T, : :71: ‘* 3 &
R/0. Eira1n.hap’i_J¢ra;’.A * — .
Gu1bafga–58′:3 .. .AP13;E3LLANT
{By »’i3£3§3}1pa3’1de for appsilantj
V’
S/’0, ‘Gouda Samad
Gwgtdar. . ‘ ‘
Age’:~45’*–§;ears, Or.:c:L€:r:tu2*er
» v. _ ‘ In MS}; Junior Coliega,
V. ., Ki *0, Datta Nagar,
” .AA.Jexv_a’rgi Coierzy,
C’§~L1}ba.rga–585 183. . . .RESP{)NDEN’I’
(By Sri. Sharanabasappa Patii for raspondent).
{I/.
E»)
This MFA is filed under Orcier 43 Rule: Ht) ” (‘3}:’C,
against 111:: order dated 23~12~2006 pa’s$C:i’–_ Vin
Misailase No.76/06 on the file of the PI’1.E’i$§fi;iC§V’§.:1;lL’igC;’ %
Gulbarga, dismissing the petitian filed u11d_e’r £31f’§.”t&i*
R2116 19 of CPC far ;*est03ratioz1 of RA 3f3,’»€i}__E§j~.£ii’s:12«ifssgf<ii= .. '
far dafault.
This M24 coming on for T£~I<§23;'ii:gA' mi$'::;–ioI1.fh;i's; €Za3?;_
1:116 court delivered the follow-§;1g:w
This appeal is éixéritiéd datctd 2-':3~12~
06 passed Jftzfige, Gnlbarga in
Misc. Case 1 iv. .
2 By t}V3c:” the court belew has
rétjected the ‘fled ¥:»y the appallafit under Order
&1¥§r–(;f Vfi:$’i”éstore the agapeai to file.
filed reguiar appeal in
H: came: it} be dismisseéi for non—
01§i”‘1§~8~,’2G4(}6. Thereafter, the appcilant flied
égpfiéafidn to restore tbs appeal to fiica. That appiicatimi
V .T V V Ifiadljeézi rejected.
YV
” _ re.i£§6ndsni;.
4. aggrieved by that, the appeliant herein héihfiffieé
this appeal,
53. The .lear;1ed c:o11:1st:1 f0_:_r..t.h¢’ K x
that the Cmzfi beiow was not }§,1s-t:ffit:::i in
agaplicafion. He: also s1zbn.i}_fi§:_d, rig: ‘on tiV1e~.
app€IL21I1t’s counsel haii gone “i:<:§ «$9 cofiduct an
ektcfian petition and %}1a.f€;fQrc_ }1»§;'Wéi'SV'}1{ii~§}r€S€flt befem the
court when the case wa,<»3..cé1iEe(i.31aé "iheféf;;';*<7:9, the court was
not j11stiiie€§ {he :_4Va;g§ijii{éati0n. He themfom
submiviivtedv eriier cannot be sustained in
law: T
"'F.h_é1*::_ is "representation on behalf of the
H carefufly CO}T1SidE1'('i{§ the subm:iss.iz:ms
ifiacfié by counsel for the appfiflflflt.
Z I find Considezabie farce in the submifision ezzaf the
caunsel fer the appeilant, $61" the rczasvzm, the appeai
Wigiqs beer: dismissefi for nan-pnmsecution on 19-8-2806.
IV
Tfiereafter, appiic-ation has been fiiad to restara $i:%;~V
is fikt, am tha grouné, tbs colnrasel fin" the V'
gene to Seciam to condacii an v:~:.i&:<::t;i<;:3 .g}::ti€."_¥:r:1 'i;§€ffii'fOI'£'3_, V
he was 11:31 prmem before the c'9ur':_"Wi:1er£~_if:;5*: Qas=§"*~
called, 'I"ht:1*sfm'e, in my Corssidgrsci isi€:w,. the E;§reioW'» '
'wag not justified in rejecting ;2pp;Li_cati<5::«a,13d E61106, firm
impilgned oriiar cannot"~b§i su'$tair;£tl"=§r'1»~
9. A;:c«:¥;%ci:ing1j§’, V éaiiowed anti Ethe:
impugned ;ci:’::”.« «_:::.=i V”‘s.ff:<;1;:~t beimw in Mis.C:c2se
N't:).76,"2G{)6 i;é§i§::a;r'4:3:'}V.§,e{"~gs;de ";§it:€i thc appeal in
R.A,No,30/20 {}55"is The cmzrt beiew is
ciimcied to .of"t§:§: '{.x?itE1i11 six merlths from tha
data gbf £1 c:0p§?'i§i"v–€£*:«is order,
Sd/-3
Iudg33