High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri D Rangaswamy vs The Managing Director K S R T C on 2 September, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri D Rangaswamy vs The Managing Director K S R T C on 2 September, 2009
Author: N.Ananda


IN TEIE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT

mmm THIS 7113 2:»! ms: or szrrsmaza j%

BEFDRE

THE HOIPBLE

Sri Dflamaawamy V

Slo.late Devarajegowda ;
A8°€1about44yem’8
R/atAnhpurav:’11a.ge&pw–*; ‘ H H V
HaaaanTah1k8sDfiat;riz:t
‘V
C/ca.Sri V.

1- a . …..

_ ‘2.__Mfa

Ca; Ltd.

c Man%
Complex

I&:«}fi4′.; I Flow, Ialbagh mad

‘ road}

Srihfiahaxaaer Pranad Sharma

Ivlajea-, Sf o.Chabi1 Daaa Shm-ma
0pp:I-{ix-a I’uh15c Schnoi

M wwwww Wm «WW-fimwmwmwww Haww WWW’Ni mm” %mmfi”&M&mé’w~% §”$E€Wi£”fi §”3.a*575kFé€N’J73fi’EM’Ka% %”§§€§?§”§ %:€

Samamtd District
Delhi-110001.

(BySriM.ArunHx1I:%,Ad\r. i5arR-2)

Tm mm filedu/3 173(1) ornvact, _
judi and award datzad l6.Q8.2£X37
Na.32-453} 2336 on the file of f
cf 8% Causes, Member, MAL’.[‘,
Bangalore (SCC.H.No.14), _

Ear co1np%tita::3.

Tm» MFA E ‘ma this

Tag gamma. With me
parfam it is taken up for
ma: dhpoaal; L

‘m. aL camposite mlgcxme. The
afK.S.R.’I’.C has involved in

u-ibumu has held that me clanznan’ t

m or claim petition, it is atahed that tiw

» . _ was due tn rash and mgment drixm -of driver
naming H0.I3L–(}1-€.§B~Oi229. 1: is aha mama

tlmtainoemova11ickesamkxw>lvad,fi:1mseii’thsa

tribunal comes to the conclusion that the drivera_.._9f

campensation shall be apportioned
‘impugned order. Ihcrofom,

‘ order in set aside.

tribunal for reoomideraticg. is gt to
far proper I directed to
send back ufflaiu order.

Sci/w
JUDGE