Central Information Commission Judgements

Ms.Bharti Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 2 November, 2011

Central Information Commission
Ms.Bharti Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 2 November, 2011
                        CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                            Club Building (Near Post Office)
                          Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
                                 Tel: +91-11-26161796

                                                             Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2011/001863/15439
                                                                     Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2011/001863

Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal:

Appellant                                  :          Ms. Bharti Gupta
                                                      B-2/213, sector-17, Rohini
                                                      Delhi-11089

Respondent                                 :         Mr. M. P. Gupta
                                                     Public Information officer &
                                                     Superintending engineer-II
                                                     Municipal Corporation of Delhi
                                                     Rohini zone,
                                                     Sector-5,Rohini , Delhi.

RTI Application filed on                       :     28-12-2010
PIO replied on                                 :     03-02-2011
First appeal filed on                          :     08-02-2011
First Appellate Authority order of              :    19-04-2011
Second appeal received on                        :   14-07-2011

        Q.No        Information sought                                Reply of PIO
        1.          Information as about the sealing the flat what    Not available in Rohini
                    are the number of photographs? (Write correct     zone.
                    Sr. No.)
        2.          Provide copies of these photographs signed by     Same as above.
                    MCD authorized officer.

Grounds for the First Appeal:
The CPIO did not give complete and true information..

Order of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):
Reply given by the PlO is sufficient.

Ground of the Second Appeal:
PIO had not given complete and true information.

Relevant Facts

emerging during Hearing:

The following were present
Appellant : Absent;

Respondent : Mr. Jagdish Gulyani, OI on behalf of Mr. M. P. Gupta, PIO & SE-II;

The respondent states that he has provided information available on the records. The respondent
states that for minor demolition actions photographs are not taken by the MCD.
Decision:

The Appeal is disposed.

Information available on the records appears to have been provided.
This decision is announced in open chamber.
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.

Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
02 November 2011
(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.) (HA)