{N THE HIGH caum" 0;? KARNATAKA AT BANGALVQi'1E_f§._V
DATED THIS THE} 22% my <13? JUNE 2Q€r9- 5
BEFORE
THE HON=BLE MR.JUS'I'i(f:E L.:§iAR,§?:§.r§';a s;;;§wI§r _
WRIT PETITION Ne.5:33i2c+o8 f¥;LR~R;E--S3 "
BE'i'WEE}I*~E: V'
Sri Siddappa {gig Gavi Sidci<:g<)wcia_.____ '
Sfo. Bettegowda J A
Aged about 6'7 yezars A
{)c<::Agricu1t:urist 2
Fa'/a: Kodi N'aga;t:a£1a}i:i, Hamle}£0f'*Kewdl}f "
Kappa Iiobli, Maz'3ci_1:_1"--'Fa_€uk5
Mandya .
. . . Petitioner
(B3; Sri D.Nag§§1faj', : _
AND:
1.
The £}ep:1t§g Commissiarier
.~ . Mandya: '__§fzaj1,1i<, I\?iZ$i£:aT._i'§frCl'i.)iSt1'i{3t.
. *?'§;é:'*'Fai;$fi<i2s: "'v
L'Ma1;ziya. 71 Mandya District.
Sri Réejanasé LA AT
'V S/.o.'Chéd:1nCg0wda
._ '-Ageé abcmt E35 yeazs
QL:t::.. gxgricultuxést
* i_<;'.a; Settihafii Vfliage, Kappa tiobii
_ !€»§addt1I'Ta111.k
u Miéztndya District.
"'K.A.Cham:irashckaI"a, Advocate for R3}
...R&sp0I1dem;s
Sn" Riiumar, HCGP for R1 8:. R2; Sri
"\
B»)
This patition is flied under Articles 226 85 227
Constitution of India, praying ta quash the o;7;:if5;1". ti:3[te<i* V.
14. 10.20134, passad by the :'£:'*=~*1 respondent at Ar11'"i6XLiI'f.E§_K Es '
This petition earning on for final bearing u
mafia the fsfimving:
oRDER\ ”
The 1t:a1’I1€d Couzttsel f()I’ £f_1:v(‘f5′-.;v)’€t:i’l’.?’iAii}’I’iV:f?1″ hti
is 3 grantee of land 0t;.’Ka{az;_§i1gVi§Vi}1age,
Eviaddurr Taiuk and the 313 year 1955.
The “Saguvali Chi}? VWas:.isS.{3i’~fi in favour of
the pr€titi0ner_Va$g1;:l« on the East by
the I:}e1′<):fiV'sv:;Vi'v1;:r_;dn§:' West by Chikkalingaiah,
North $33? Sflufil by the land belenging ta
Froin fate of grant, the petitiolier is in
cultivation of the land, on 92.05.2004, a
pi£:{:'é:t__ 'i§'1" 1:asp<::ct. of the same survey zlumbcr was
V _ grméf;-=:d i-tri .f;s:¥.r?)1n" of that ('Va resprmdent.
” ‘J¥’he 31*’ msgmndent has made an application for
_’¢’h§::gé of land. Clonsérqutrzxtiy, on 92.06.2604, the land
V’ ‘granted to the petitricanrzr was overlapping with the lanai
granteri hr: the 3″‘ respofident. Henccg the k-tamed (}<?;:14:i'*i:s'._§el
for the petitielaer submits that by v:i:rtue of A11neX:;i'€-«K
14.¥{).’2f)04., the {and grrantrtd in favour of the
overlaps with the land of petiticxiér fiizgagfs’
A3:mexure–K.
3. T316: Imrned €’.3m1nsae1 Rid tfiagydwrsfanfvislsflifimits
that the 33116 granted in his faxréiirég Anné;§iiréV¥K is not
ove1*Iap}_:;ing with the land }:Et’i§_tianr:r. Hence,
izhers isVvV’1″1?;’f:i1n{:i1:it f_1″sc=, p;eE’iiti<3«Iu1_'" prays for dismissal of
the pefifionfi _
4._ Tht§”~cc§nt:::i1:i£5:1 iii’. the pefitioner is that he is thf:
thc Iaiidsifstie 1965 in respect of 1 aCl’€’: of land
and” 116 ‘”<";{}1';t:i1111(3Lis ocrctlpatian and p€;)SS€SSi{)I1 of fhc
A:1::a.ex:1re–K§ the land grantsd ix: favom Qf
'ihe ffsyhndent QVETIQIES with the land grwnffld in the
f3:%étifik:¥;1e::r", 'x
Z3' Fm the ctnntmry, the ieamed {Tn111ma'EA. fo1'-ffié'"i%*°§f
respondent submits that grant of ia'I1<i~–.as
will :10 Where overlap with the land nééid 'to
6. In View of the rival €:ef§”t:;%itions the
parties, as there is fact1:{%3;i..§iis1§i;:”f’;;:’VA thé v_v1’3}AaIH”§ic$, it is
nccassary that this fa-.ct’ VA befoxt the
compcatent a11ti)§or_$;.f}:-. A b’ ‘ I
?.
*;*1§e1’p*a§r1e§§”i;%;V” Emu a direction to both the
partries to é§;;;gi'(:acv1′:._th,af”cu;{“xpeteni authmity in respect of
_ their.»;:§i§.raju(;c>nte1:ifis;snV$__:hat the lands granted :0 them cavarlap
*__wit:.:i€1-.¢a1:IE1: than the possession of the land grantfid
‘fé.\.FQi}I;.(}§f;§1CVEffiéfitiflllfif shafi not be disturbfid, so also the
V _ Ismzi §j’ra1’2″t¢d”Ei§ favrsn-r €){f.§1i°,3’d mspnndent. Na casts.
3&5″
Iudge