High Court Kerala High Court

Suman.P.S vs State Of Kerala Represented on 8 February, 2010

Kerala High Court
Suman.P.S vs State Of Kerala Represented on 8 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 424 of 2010()


1. SUMAN.P.S,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.BHASKARAN PILLAI

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN

 Dated :08/02/2010

 O R D E R

P.BHAVADASAN, J.

————————————-
Cr. MC No.424 of 2010

————————————-
Dated 8th February 2010

Order

This is a petition filed under S.482 of the Code

of Criminal Procedure, praying for a direction to the

Additional Sessions Court, Pathanamthitta to dispose of

the application filed by the petitioner, seeking discharge.

2. The petitioner is the second accused in SC

No.75/08 pending before the Additional Sessions Court,

Pathanamthitta for having committed the offences under

S.41(1)(a)(b) of Cr.P.C., S.225(b) and S.402 IPC r/w S.27

of the Arms Act.

3. It is averred in this petition that while the

committal proceedings in the above said case were

pending, the petitioner filed Cr.MC No.2299/06 before this

Court to have the committal proceedings quashed as

against her. This Court disposed of the said petition by

observing that the petitioner was at liberty to raise all her

CRMC 424/10 2

contentions before the Trial Court during the preliminary

hearing before framing the charges. Thereafter, the case

was committed to the Additional Sessions Court,

Pathanamthitta. She availed of the opportunity and filed a

petition before the said Court, praying for a discharge. A

copy of the said petition is produced as Annexure A2. The

petitioner submits, the matter was heard, but so far, no

orders have been passed in the petition. The only prayer

of the petitioner in this petition is for a direction to the

Additional Sessions Court, Pathanamthitta to consider the

petition filed by her for discharge as early as possible.

4. I feel that the grievance of the petitioner is

genuine and justified. This Court in the order in Cr.MC

No.2299/06 had given liberty to the petitioner to move the

Trial Court for appropriate reliefs. Accordingly, she filed a

petition before the Court below for discharge. The

petitioner was heard in the matter. So, the Court below was

bound to pass orders in the matter forthwith. Whatever that

be, the Court below is directed to pass orders on the

CRMC 424/10 3

petition filed by the petitioner, which has been produced as

Annexure A2 in this petition, in accordance with law. In

case the Court feels that fresh arguments are necessary,

the case may be posted for hearing after notice to the

learned Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsel

for the petitioner. The above said petition shall be

disposed of by the Court below as expeditiously as

possible, at any rate, within three weeks from the date of

production of a copy of this order.

The Petition is disposed of as above.





                                  P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE



sta

CRMC 424/10    4