High Court Jharkhand High Court

Naresh Kumar Yadav vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 August, 2011

Jharkhand High Court
Naresh Kumar Yadav vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 August, 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI      
                  W.P. (S) No. 2573 of 2011

Naresh Kumar Yadav                                            ...... Petitioner
                         Versus 
The State of Jharkhand & ors.          ...... Respondents
                        ­­­­­­­­­
CORAM:  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL  
                        ­­­­­­­­­
For the Petitioner                   :    Mr. Rupesh Singh, Advocate
For the Respondents                  :    J.C. to A.G.
                             ­­­­­­­­­
              th
 04/Dated: 19    August, 2011
                              

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is under 
suspension and the departmental inquiry is going on from March 2011 and the 
inquiry has not yet been completed and during the period of suspension, the 
petitioner has been transferred, for which, separate interlocutory application 
has been instituted for getting stay, in which, this Court vide order dated 16th 
August, 2011 has stayed the order of transfer dated 23rd June, 2011, which is at 
Annexure­ IA/2 to the interlocutory application, till today. 

2.   Learned   counsels   for   the   respondents   submitted   that   today   a   counter 
affidavit   has   been   filed,   in   which,   it   has   been   stated   that   inquiry,   pending 
against the petitioner, will be completed within a period of three months.

3. In   view   of   the   aforesaid   submissions   and   looking   to   the   nature   of 
allegations   levelled   against   the   petitioner,   the   respondents   have   all   right   to 
conduct   the   inquiry   against   the   petitioner.   Departmental   inquiry   is   already 
going   on   and   as   per   the   counter   affidavit   filed   today   by   the   Deputy 
Superintendent   of   Police   (H.   Qr.),   Ranchi,   the   inquiry   will   be   completed 
withing   a   period   of   three   months.   I   therefore   direct   the   respondents   to 
complete the inquiry, pending against the petitioner, within a period of three 
months from today. In no circumstance, the time limit granted hereinabove will 
be extended by the respondents themselves, for getting the extension of time 
limit   to   complete   the   inquiry,   separate   application   will   be   preferred   by   the 
respondents before this Court with specific reasons. Meanwhile, the order of 
stay, passed by this Court dated 16th August, 2011 against the order dated 23rd 
June, 2011, which is at Annexure­ IA/2 to the interlocutory application, shall 
be continued to remain in operation, till the departmental inquiry is over.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not 
getting subsistence allowance since last two months.

       ­2­

5. I therefore direct the Inspector General of Police, Ranchi to see that the 
subsistence   allowance   is   paid   to   the   petitioner,   regularly   and   whatever   is 
accumulated, shall be paid within a period of fifteen days from today.

6. The writ petition as well as I.A. No. 2077 of 2011 are disposed of, in view 
of the aforesaid directions.

                                 (D.N. Patel, J.)
Ajay