IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
FA No.165 of 1967
KISHUN SAH & ORS
Versus
GANESH SAH & OPS
-----------
92. 22.09.2010 Heard the parties on I.A. No. 6040 of 2005.
This is an application under Order 22 Rule 4 C.P.C.
filed on behalf of the appellant for the substitution of the
legal representatives of the deceased respondent no. 2
namely Jagganath Shah. The substitution application is
within time.
Accordingly I.A. no. 6040 of 2005 is allowed.
The legal representatives as mentioned in detail in
paragraph no. 1 of the application are substituted in place
of the deceased respondent no. 2.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of
respondent no. 4 stated that the appellant has not
mentioned the other legal representatives who are the
daughters of the deceased respondent no. 2. However, no
such affidavit has been filed giving the details of the said
daughters. Therefore, if in future the daughters and/or any
other legal representatives appear and filed any application
that may be considered according to law.
The appellant shall take steps for appeal notice
on the newly substituted respondents in ordinary process
within one week.
Sushma ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)
2