High Court Kerala High Court

P.M. Hassankutty vs State Of Kerala on 24 September, 2009

Kerala High Court
P.M. Hassankutty vs State Of Kerala on 24 September, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 3097 of 2009()


1. P.M. HASSANKUTTY, PROPRIETOR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC
                       ...       Respondent

2. N.N. DIVAKARAN, S/O. P.K. NARAYANAN,

                For Petitioner  :SMT.RUBY K.JOSE

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :24/09/2009

 O R D E R
              M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.

              ------------------------------------------
               CRL.M.C.NO. 3097 OF 2009
              ------------------------------------------

             Dated     24th     September          2009


                           O R D E R

Petitioner was convicted and sentenced for

the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable

Instruments Act. Sentence includes a direction to pay

compensation of Rs.2,00,000/-. Petitioner filed

Crl.A.354/2009 before Sessions court, Kottayam and

also filed Crl.M.P.1868/2009 to suspend the sentence.

Learned Additional Sessions Judge while suspending

the sentence directed the petitioner to deposit

Rs.50,000/- within two months as a condition. This

petition is filed to delete the said condition.

2. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner

was heard.

3. Argument of the learned counsel is that

petitioner is not in a position to deposit Rs.50,000/-

and when there is every chance of reversal of the

conviction, learned Sessions Judge is not justified

in directing the petitioner to deposit Rs.50,000/-.

Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submitted

CRMC 3097/09
2

that if petitioner is to deposit a portion of the

amount, leniency may be shown.

4. On hearing the learned counsel, I find no

reason to interfere with Annexure-A3 order. When cheque

is for Rs.2,00,000/- and the sentence sought to be

suspended includesz compensation of Rs.2,00,000/-,

learned Sessions is justified in directing to deposit

Rs.50,000/- for suspending the sentence. If the

petitioner is not in a position to deposit the same, he

is at liberty to approach the learned Sessions Judge to

dispose the appeal expeditiously. If such a petition is

filed, Sessions Judge is to dispose the appeal

expeditiously.

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,
JUDGE.

uj.