I.K.Sulthapuri S/O Kasimsab vs State Of Karnataka on 3 February, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT
DHARWAD. 

DATED THIS THE 3rd DAY 01:' FEBRUARY zoiof T 'V

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE i§;L»;r.iANJ'tIN_,¥m71'<_    D

AND Q
THE HON'BLE MR. JUS1';IQEv..ARAVIND'  
Writ Petition Nos. 65804 toi65i8'05' 2OC}9'(S.--.KA;'i')

Between:

1. I.K.Su1thapuri V   " Q
S/o Kasimsab, Argeii. years =
Working as 'D'.--GroL'{p_E3nip1oyee _ D
District Prirnei-cry E'ducation""?1I'0j'ect_: A
Block ReSo1,1rce~.CE;ri«fi._,¢, 1\T.aV'e,lgund_VTa1i1k
District Dvhafwadl V' V'  D" 

2. Sri M.M. Navalur .
S / o Mohammad Sab
Aged about 45"§rear$  ._ 
Working "as. 'D' Group Employee

 " '~Distrifct~Prirma,_ry Edt1ca--tio'n Project

 Block Resoiircerfllentre, Kundagol

'Hubli Taluk,' R District Dharwad .. Petitioners

 {By Sri  Advocate)

..':'~.5fid?

 iiflfite State of Karnataka

_Rc.p"res:e'nted by its Secretary--II
" « «Education Department

  -P.r_1'fi1aIy 81. Secondary Education



(BySriVCiS,Pati1,_ii:Addl. Govt. Advocate)

 Dharwadi District' A. 

. The Deputy Director

M.S.Building, Bangalore --- 560 001

The Commissioner for Public
Instructions in Karnataka

New Public Offices

Nrupathunga Road

Bangalore 560 001

The State Project Director

District Primary Education Project

No.8, K.S.C.M.F'. Building V.  
2"' Floor, 3" Block, Cunningham__F{oad
Bangalore --- 560 001 ' V. "

Of Public Instructions--EX§lO£i'ic-i.o~   P
District Primary EducationH_Pr'oj_ectV_ L

Bijapur District _: '
The Co--Ordin_ato'r"  _  
Block Resource Ce"vé1'%tre » 4'  -  '
(D.P.E.P.) Navalgu'l1'd:Talul{  "

Dharwacl"Dist'ricjLf. 'V 

The Co-Ordinator "  V 

Block ResourcellCen'tre".Al »-- Vi 

(D.P.E.P_.) Kun'd.ago1,_I---Iubli Taluk

.. Respondents

  petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of

lii*-.__,the Co1istitutions.ofAclIndia praying to quash the impugned order dt.

25.10.2007 rriade"lin Application Nos. 4762 and 4763 of 2003 and



A  These petitions coming on for preliminary hearing this day,

 l§_rai'rind--Kumar J., delivered the following:



ORDER

Heard learned counsel appearing for the part,ies;;’.._r~..The

petitioners are challenging the legality and correctnessroi’gj145}§i’,

Passed in O.A.No.4762 and 4763 of 2003. During. \c%§ur$eai:£)i”~ .

arguments it is brought to our notice that th.e_faotS.iin”thelpresent

case and the relief sought for in the present case isfisirnivlar to thatl»

in writ petition No.6567l. of 2009._ lT’otllay_ welllhaxaretiisniissed the
said appeal. Following the andiifori reasons stated therein,

the present petitions are dismissed, 1

1 ..