IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAE
DATED mas THE mm mm op NQVEMBER _
BEFOREWV
THE HOINPBLE MR.JUsTicE=.ARAMT§a;O'H.AHN' REE-'iyfi 1'
WRIT ¥'E'1'I'£'ION No.3}251 c':~Fg_>_o3 R
BETWEEN; 1' 'V V V" V' 1
1 sm' GEE-TA D)' §"'MUIéAr_}A3?m..VVVK1;;,1<AI§M
AGED 52 YEARS,' 'Qcc%_13Ap:K E.Ml?L{)_YEE
uc0vV.1§szxre"'§5:, 3 V - ~--
R"/"0 J.13;mAi{A1.GALL1
BELGAL'*M._ "
yaw AT {3~I)"LBA.
(By_Sri.'P1RAVEEif§ K1_iM.A'R RAIKOTE, ADV.)
MMMMM
' 'vTHE~}§'E)DL DIRECTOR
' OF POLICE
c1v_i--_1. RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT DIRECFORATE
,1'£3AN..r3AL0RE
AA 2 " -THE DISTRICI' CASTE VERIFICATION coMMm'EE
BY ITS CHAIRMAN
DEPUTY COMMISSIGNER
BELGAUM DISTRICT, BELGAUM.
T 3 UCO BANK
BY ITS MANAGER
$139121? MARKET
GU LBARGA 5 AK
{J
h PETITIONERS.
post <2
4 TAHASILSAR
BELGAUM RES§_i5O?€»l3'}?1I¢f'F$;'
(By Sri. R.K. HA'I'I'!, HCGP FOR R13
RESPONDENTS 2, 3 3:. 4 DELETE?) VEDE <;";o_L:rjré1¥v 'QRBER
DATED 14.-11«20o3)
THIS W.P.IS FILED U5-¥l3*.ER AV.’i?*£’I’V(3LES;32 :;.’-tivifia. 2:37
THE CONSTITUTION ms’ INU!A””v.PRAYING ‘TS, QEIASH THE’
IMPUGNED LETTER OF R-1 DATE}? NIL ‘VIBE AISi;NEXURE-
THIS PETITION COMi-Naif <'1):N'T_ SGR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THISVDAY, '£'HE_COIJRf}' I-4AD'E 1,';-'HE FOLLOWING:
~ f Vy" GREEK ——–
gf’-he’ of M/s. Uoo Bank at its
Supczf secured employment to a
~1-‘fig to belong to a Scheduled Caste. When
L’ Vfhb’ that regard was sen’: for verification, it was
iigfiéed petitioner did not belong to the Scheduled
éxgdvaccoréingly, proceedings were initiated which has
V’ ” nfiiially fesuited in a proceeding pending before: the Appellate
under the Karnataka Scheduled Castes, Scheduled
u “Tribes And Backward Classes {Reservation ofApp<3int1nc13ts,
etc), Act, 1990, (for short 'Act? and that, during the
Mk
pendency of the appeal, it is aileged that the 13* respondent -~
Additional Director General of Poiice, civ~;:,,j~-.1§ig31ts
Enfoteeinent Directorate, Bangaiore, Without»
law, addressed a communication dated .
the UCO Bank -~ the petitio1:.ter's emp2o3{e§r,'«'eto.i
terminate the petitioner then
Hence, this Writ petition.
2. There is considejrabie fijrce submission of the
1ea1netit”‘coi.;:r;,seI’:’:*ft’or “the. ‘ petitrleztier that the respondent,
Withotat anthoiitfof a cotnmunication to the
Bank toVVV’tetfininateVt;*;Le’.;se1vices of the petitioner. Learned
is out to any gzrovision of law by which
‘ would have the jurisdiction to address such
H and direct the employer to terminate the
the setvices of the Bank. The directions
2 , ”isst1ed in the communication Annexure-“C” smacks of
‘ ess and is tmsustamable. In the result, this Writ
‘ V’ “petition is allowed. The communication dated ‘nil’
Annextu:’e~”(3” of the respondent is quashed. It is made clear
that if the petitioner does not succeed in the progeedings
xeiating to the vmification of the Caste Certificate issued
her, Shit Wouli not be cntifled to continue to b.o1d.__the ‘ii ‘
which was mserved for the Scheduleti Caste.
KS