High Court Kerala High Court

Ajayakumar vs State Of Kerala on 21 January, 2008

Kerala High Court
Ajayakumar vs State Of Kerala on 21 January, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 313 of 2008()


1. AJAYAKUMAR, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.BHASKARAN
                      ...  Petitioner
2. BHASKARAN,
3. JAGADAMMA, AGED 62 YEARS, PEROOR
4. JAYA BOSE, AGED 42 YEARS, W/O.BOSS,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.GIREESH VARMA

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :21/01/2008

 O R D E R
                          R.BASANT, J.
                       ----------------------
                        B.A.No.313 of 2008
                   ----------------------------------------
             Dated this the 21st day of January 2008

                              O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioners are the

husband and his relatives. The marriage took place on

22/6/2003. The spouses are not blessed with any children. They

are admittedly residing separately. Long after the separate

residence commenced, the present crime has been registered.

The crime has, in turn, been registered on the basis of a private

complaint filed by the de facto complainant before the learned

Magistrate and referred by the learned Magistrate to the police

under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Investigation is in progress. The

petitioners apprehend imminent arrest. .

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners prays, the

learned Public Prosecutor does not oppose the said prayer and I

am satisfied, in the facts and circumstances of this case that the

petitioners can be granted anticipatory bail. In coming to this

conclusion I take note of the broad circumstances in this case. I

take note of the fact that arrest and detention of the petitioners

is likely to mar all possibilities of harmonious reconciliation of

B.A.No.313/08 2

the matrimonial tie. Appropriate conditions can of course be

imposed.

3. In the result, this petition is allowed. Following

directions are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C in favour of the

petitioners.

i) Petitioners shall surrender before the learned

Magistrate having jurisdiction at 11 a.m on 28/01/2008. They

shall be released on regular bail on condition that they execute

bonds for Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twenty five thousand only) each

with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction

of the learned Magistrate.

ii) The petitioners shall make themselves available for

interrogation before the investigating officer between 10 a.m

and 3 p.m on 29/01/2008 and 30/01/2008. During this period,

the investigating officer shall be at liberty to interrogate the

petitioners in custody and take all necessary steps for the proper

conduct of the investigation in this crime. Thereafter the

petitioners shall so appear on all Mondays and Fridays between

10 a.m and 12 noon for a period of two months. Subsequently

the petitioners shall so appear as and when directed by the

investigating officer in writing to do so.

B.A.No.313/08 3

(iv) If the petitioners do not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to

arrest the petitioners and deal with them in accordance with law,

as if these directions were not issued at all.

(v) If they were arrested prior to 28/01/2008, they shall

be released from custody on their executing a bond for

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) without any

sureties, undertaking to appear before the learned Magistrate on

28/01/2008.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr

B.A.No.313/08 4

B.A.No.313/08 5

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007