High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Raja Babu Soni vs State Of Bihar on 18 August, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Raja Babu Soni vs State Of Bihar on 18 August, 2010
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr.Misc. No.27595 of 2010
                      RAJA BABU SONI, SON OF JAYPRAKASH VERMA
                                           Versus
                                    STATE OF BIHAR
                                         -----------

2. 18.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that there is no allegation of

the petitioner having fired at the deceased.

In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who

is in custody since 13.5.2010 and has no criminal antecedents,

be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in Siwan (Town)

P.S. Case No. 84 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:

(i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner

who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is

related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish

information to the court about any change in address of the

petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the

petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he

shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state

on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after

his release in the present case and thereafter the court below
2

will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail

on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given

date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to

do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his

bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That

the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to

be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali