IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BAN
I
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE 'f?g'§})l§Y
BEFORE
DATED THIS THE 2151* DAY 09 JANUARY, 142e:'1ig:A'
MISC.W.8377 o%O1%'«'"«E2éI)AOs§
£13-«..
BETWEEN:
WRIT PETITION No.22a4a 0132003 I(';f;(V§';fV:é'*r') O'
SAVITHA w/0 LATE. RAJANIJA O ' 1-
AGED ABCIUT_47
H R
S/0.LATE_Ig:AJA;\INA;~V.'I_* I "
HQR SUSIIEIA-».:}:'I '-
D /O. LATE RA,IAI\INA.' " e
AGED .'A;BOU".'T 24 YEA;Rs.
,, R0o§>A.sIfIREE
- 'o,fQ.LATE RAJANNA.
V. _, _ A(_}f3{)--ABQU"l' 22 YEARS.
"R:'L;}I§%Qi;§m'sHREE
D/O,I.A;TE RAJANNA,
AG=ED*ABOUT 19 YEARS.
- ALI; ARE R/AT.RAYASPII:i'I'TIPURA
_' "'-NAMEINAYAKANAHALI.I POST
BASARALU HOBLI. MANDYA TALUK
MANDYA DIST
... PETITIONERS.
M
[By Sri: A V G ASSOCIATES, ADVS.
SR]. A.V. GANGADHARAPPA & G. RAVISHANKAR, ADVS.)
AND:
1 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
MANDY DISTRICT,
MANDYA
2 THE ASST COMMISSIONER
MANDYA SUB DIVISION
MANDYA 7
3 PUTTANARASAMMA
W/OANJANEYA '
R/OTARIKERE. KOPPA I»IO.I3LI
MADDURU TALUK
MANDYA DIST ' '
4 KSRINIVASA _ 5 ~
S/O.LATE R KENCHAIAH "
R/O.cHAI;:zII§IAKE.RE, " "
DUNDIAI-IAIi'AL_LI~vDAI<IeIA1I_E if; . I
£I71'H£~\GLIIF{1IUI:IIi.OI3IS§IIIIVLADDURU TALUK
MRNDYA DIST; V. RESPONDENTS.
(By Srnt: M:’C.,_NAOAsRRE’E. HCGP FOR R1 3; 2.
SR}; L. RAJA, A£.YV_._ FOR R3]
THIS ‘MIsc.w. Is FILED UNDER ORDER 6 RULE 17
»REA,D .WIT§’£_°:’_3ECTION I51 OF THE cpc PRAYING TO
V–.PEiRMIIT.f’7_H’E2 PE:.TITIONERs TO AMEND THE PETITION BY
‘–THE COLIRT MADE THE F’OLLOW}NG:§
ADDING ‘TI”aI;«: SAID PARAORAPRS TREREIN.
TIa?IAs”I{/1Isc.w, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY
E
E» ‘E
0 R E R
This application, according to the learned counsel
for the applicant, is for additional grounds in support of
interim relief and for raising an additional re1i’e:f*ViiLi.V:t’he
writ petition. A l l V’ l
2. There is no opposition -to” the a_4pp.1ic’a:fjion.v._f,F’or
the reasons set out in the afi”id’avi:_ accorn,_1.)anying”~the._
application, the same is allowed, Petitioner, isV”:pe1’rnitted V’
to file an amended vV7:it..V_petitionr by ._before”2–2lw2010.