High Court Karnataka High Court

K A Sadiq S/O C U Ummer vs State Of Karnataka on 9 March, 2010

Karnataka High Court
K A Sadiq S/O C U Ummer vs State Of Karnataka on 9 March, 2010
Author: N.Ananda


534 mg 3:93 CQLIR? Q? KARNATAK5 Pa’? BA.N§;;fi;:;::.R–.§§_V’1′ ;_. A’

m’rE:£§ ‘?i~££S THE: 9%! DAY <7)? MARQ;:..:::éj:Q5 5f: ._ 1

BEFORE
ma: HQNELE MR¢3§J.?3T1c:§~..;,;,"ANANTM.T "
C'r"E'f.,.P. §$a¢3€§'?f'"2%i§ .

BETWEEN: , –

E{.A.$adi;-rt; 2 u

SI9. {1.U.Umm&r, agcé abm1;€_ 38 . ”

Rja: M.Ba&agaV;i3.1age, Mzzmad ‘ _ V ”

Pemnanant: r] 0, Y:i:fi1IIl€II§.E1{ili’ iffllgxget. — _ V_

Napakiu ‘V

Madikiiri .’ V’ » ,..Petiti<31::3I'

(33! Sri. G' Rafi ' .

gwg: . . . . T.

State af

4_ _. By Mad 1§E:e:*§ ~ Rumi’ E’ai§ca S f.-ilafiesn

. 1;:§,£i1’k£3ri’ 3

A ‘ Regfx.’ ‘§:1.y }}3.§i}§_iC -E3§r::2s<&t::11f::”:5:’ :31′: baii in Crime §*${3.2?§_,f2(}O% of Eéasiikéri

“}€2:;:af:’ –P€:{3ic€ Siatian, pazizéiigg an {ha fife ef Civii Jzzfiga {J§”,Q:::x} $2;

~ g§?a2§E*”aT§_, Eviaaiikfizi is: :2-fferzceg purxisirzabia Ltrscéaz” E§§3{Z??;§f}I”£3 3562, 41?’?
4:;9_§c;g 4:29 1%.

Thig gsetiiécszz zramiglg an 33:33″ ::s:”cir:’:z°s iiiig «day, figs C-{§F.£§”§ made

iizzi §a2E§@w’i::g:

L Thzz getiiiormr $31333 €Z>{¢3(,?i.1′{.€ bomi $2131″
R§.25,Q{)Q,1– and sshaii offer {we Su1’efi$_$’_A4§”©rV€:§i::’ ii1{§g 7

31121:: ti} {ha Sa’?€is:3facf:1’on crf°}”;1I*i:§{ii(:t}7’t):;aZ”.jC1-:3113$ ‘- _ ‘V

H. Thfi pafifionei’ Shali 11¢-ii “iz;a?m.i€iz«a.fr: or ‘é;{?i£_11
pmsscufion ¥3§?iT.Ii€SS€iS.

Hi. ‘Phi: petitiomar ShaH’f€g’u1é&;’l§ ;J$1″{.Tg§:§’}fi~:”1: “LT:iT}:€’£’ €ZZie;::11r£’

$1:”%E’«I.i’