IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RSA No. 288 of 2005(A)
1. SMT.K.K.ADIMA, W/O.LATE AYYAPPAKUTTY,
... Petitioner
2. K.B.ABU, S/O.BEERAN, KALLUNGAL HOUSE,
3. CHOTHI, S/O.VALLON, NONGATHURUTHI HOUSE,
4. K.K.KRISHNANKUNJU, S/O.KUNJUNNI,
5. K.R.KAUSALIYA,
6. KADEEJABI, W/O.M.M.ABDULKADER,
7. SMT. KADEEJA,
8. E.R.KRISHNAN, S/O.RAMAN,
9. SMT.SAIDA MAJEED, W/O.MAJEED,
10. SMT.K.K.KALI, W/O.AYYAPPAKUTTY,
11. N.M.SAINABA, W/O.LATE AMMUKUNJU,
12. MOIDEEN, S/O.LATE MOHAMMADUNNI,
Vs
1. DR.MUHAMMED SAGHEER,
... Respondent
2. ABDUL KAREEM, S/O.ABU,
3. ABIDA, W/O.ABDUL KAREEM,
4. ALI MOHAMMED, S/O.ABDULLA,
For Petitioner :SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN
Dated :10/12/2007
O R D E R
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
--------------------------------------------
C.M.APPL. NO. 205 OF 2005 IN
R.S.A.NO. 288 OF 2005
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 10th day of December, 2007
O R D E R
Service of notice on respondents 1 and 2 was not complete. The case
was posted before the Registrar (Judicial) on 28.9.2007, 9.10.2007, 16.10.2007
and 23.10.2007 in the defect list. There was no representation on these dates
on behalf of the petitioners/appellants. Today when the case is posted in the
defect list, there is no representation for the appellants, though the case was
called twice. Therefore, this application for condonation of 64 days’ delay in
filing the appeal is dismissed for default.
(K.T.SANKARAN)
Judge
ahz/
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
——————————————–
R.S.A.NO. 288 OF 2005
——————————————–
Dated this the 10th day of December, 2007
JUDGMENT
Consequent to the dismissal of the application for condonation of delay
in filing the appeal, the Regular Second Appeal is also dismissed for default.
(K.T.SANKARAN)
Judge
ahz/