High Court Karnataka High Court

Gurunath S/O Babu Rathod vs The State, By Sec, Mines Geology, … on 21 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Gurunath S/O Babu Rathod vs The State, By Sec, Mines Geology, … on 21 January, 2009
Author: H.G.Ramesh
WCP. No.80207/ 2609

..1..

IN THE HIGH comrr or KARNATAI{A,..   :  "

cmcurr amen AT GULBARGgA. "~..::. V  ' 1%

DATED THIS THE 216'? DAY pr .;A .1c:JATn*2A.2c!o9 'A: T T

nmmm V  
THE Hownnm ma. JUi§*m:C:E.1H.é.n:;n:i:sii§
w.P. yo.si§2o7., /r3oo9_   L%I§j¢§g;agm--s1%VM" 

BETWEEN:

Gumnath    

S/0. Babu Ratilocg _. _ "

Aged ab0ut=:'4O y"aalI"$.§,3'..__ K v  ' _
Occ: C1ass--I Con ''c.toIf,''' '
Resident bf -7Sfi:enii%asa flflaya', "  '  ' "
Plot Ncg.44, Al1a:<g.a;9t:abi211'M_arga,
Homenagar, ' _   " __
Gulbarga, ' _   =   " ...PE'I'ITI()NER

(By Sfi :,r§.Bi.£a:i'ax~,'v2ad§;} 

1. ' Tbs: .Stat_;¢' Qf 
Rep"z$:sc11t:¢Ci' -byfiits Secretary',
Departmcnt "c;t"Mincs as Geologr,
M.s.Buj3giing;

   -Ba;uga1<"31ft_:'i- 560 cm.

 «2.":L."Vi"'hV.*.~*:V Efitate of Karnataka,

_  Rsprcsentcd by its Secmtary,
" Degparizntumt af Industries 85 Commerce,

 'V -M;.S.Bu:i1ding,
 Bangalore ~ 560 am.

' "'-" ' '-*V'-*'A'A 'v..'~--?_.:I" nnnwnlflnn ruufl LUUKI Ur KAKNATAKA MJGH COURT OF KARNATAKA I-HGH COURT OF KARNATAKA I-EGH COURT

 3. The Chief Engineer,

wu-n w-we «urn lIl'\l\l 1:-uuriluri

Panchayath Raj Engineering £)cpart:n1ent,
Bangalore.



.....-.-.-.- ....- ... ......--... ._..... ... -..... ... ...... ........ ...v..... V. ...--u...n.n.u-a nuns uvuns V: usvunuvcnlniu-\ nlurl LUUKI U!" IKHKNAIAKA HIGH COURT

"5

 V'  by i3_1éiri,.vendors.

W.P.No.80207/2009

-2-

4. The Chief Engineer,
P.W.I). C 6:. E (North), Dharwad.

5. The Executive Engineer,    
(FWD), Public Works, Ports and iinlanéi' .. "
Water Transport Division, Gu1bai?ga.:f" A. 

6. The Executive Engineer, _ _V .. V
Panchayath Raj E11gin.eeiing"I3'Vi,sion, 
Gulbarga.  --

7'. The Execufive Engfieeifi _ __    _
(PW D), Pubiic Works, Ports  ' 
Water Transport I)ivis.ioti,'~Bi€ia,I%_ ' "  V " 'i

8. The     
Irrigatiox;     '
Division No.--f1__, ;3u1i3ai~.ga...'t_i ._  * ' ...RESPON'DEN'1'S

(By sii s.S; (irjv.'.i3.;'_.vi'o1_' R-Vi' to R--8)
'I'1iisVW1itPeiitioi'iie._AfiieeE under Axticles 225 62'. 227 of
the Constitqtioi; of _India.p_;7aying to direct the respondents
not to .deduct::royaity fxi;-m"t.11e bills of the petitioner and not
to iI,1.5_.%'.iSf the petitioner to produce the myalw paid receipts

V "  "  Petition coming on for preliminaxy hearing,

:ihjs'_§1ay,"ti_ie_Cr;'ui1: made the following:

ORDER

it A’ Sfi’ ¢S.S.K131:n.maz1, learned Government Advocate

.’ tekesiinofiee for respondent Noel to 8.

2. By consent of the ieamed counsel on both sides,

the petition is heard on merits and is disposer} 91″ by

this order. ‘1

W/…

……….A.V__.,V_A. ………….w. nawn uuulu ur mmnamm men COURT 0; KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ma:-g coma

I[=~ ?esmm disposed of.

WP. No.8{}207/ 2909

-3-

3. Learned counsel on both sides submit: tI1éi*:.

writ petifion is similar to the ”

W.P.No.406’77/2008 which wags’ ‘Atiis;:>gg¢dt;;}i V

court on 19.11.2003; they fm~£13¢f’~.$i1bfiiif;: t1:at ”

writ petition. may m c:isposec:%§:*%:n tenns k

In View of the afifiée, “h’j§%.A:ff011Qwi11g order:

The petitiwxfer  appropriate
  not to
deduct    1:6 seek for refund

of the rdyalty, % by him. If such a

rcpresentatid12.__iS iéuithofities concerned shall

coflnsidmi. sanfié’ ‘–i2;;v___gQcordance with law and in the
1igh1:; ‘0fV i!1:¢V%d:;;£:is3io13 in W.P.N’os.3126-4-31266/I994
‘1 ‘éf31V’¥.’£’.€dVV’V to in the carder Passed in

V w,:>.z€o}406i:f’?/03.

Sd/-4-1
Judge

hkh