.”‘€.3 Q? KARMATAKA lflfifl CQEJR1
9.) W
.’ *2*k§7%.%KN%M’%.%.§% MEWW ?.,iE..Ns.¥iWJA§:.»’i¥T”‘ Rfl%NM§A!§aR Mimi”! QUUK! U? IKAKNMIRMJQ. HMSN MQMK! LN’ !(.fla!KNAIR.K& §”f$%:i2%°’?
2. The case cf the petitioner is that a apime is
registered against him .for the afi£angg§x pfiniahabla
under section 279, 337 and 304£A) of fi.s}¢§”– it is
submitted that the accident fésultéd ifi dagta ég sii»
per3¢ns.
3. Tha laarnad ccunsei*§br théuhétitignar submits
that, tha accide3§zawa§ fl#é§fl:dag té A£he rash and
negligent driving of the -§§fi£i§ne§*f§§§; it was on
account af the ,ra§h. aha €§£gli§éfit ériving of the
affanding vehitiéfcfiming”£:§m_§§§§sita direction. xt
is also suhmitt§é fiEét,”fiha petitioner had alga filad
a c¢mplain€jbef¢r§”Eh§ P§1£§eg.
4. Laaxaad G§V3§nméntVPi§ader submits that, case is
rj§§i’ate£=éEs :,,.aga’:1;xst 1’b’§t’h the drivers and it is also
suhmitt§d–§h§t ¢$ investigation the charge sheet ha
Rbvf*
1 ‘;been f1§§d. .
‘”;$§u:”5ens1&ering the same. I find that it is 39: a case
?_ wf§:r1nt3rf$r1ng with the preceedings at the ?ria1 Court.
*afl ficsrdingly, the petition is fiismissed.
Sd/#
JUDGE