High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ram Anugrah Mahto & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 25 July, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Ram Anugrah Mahto & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 25 July, 2011
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Cr.Misc. No.7133 of 2011
                 1. Ram Anugrah Mahto son of late Mathura Mahto
                 2. Ram Pravesh Mahto, son of Ram Sharan mahto
                        Both are resident of village-Sultanpur, P.S. Mokama, Dist-
                        Patna.
                                                           ...........Petitioners
                                                Versus
                    The State Of Bihar                      ..........Opp. Party
                                               -----------

4 25.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State who is armed with

carbon copy of the case diary.

Two petitioners are owner and driver of the truck

which was looted and the case was instituted at the instance of

Khalasi against one Mukesh Bind and others during

investigation truck which was recovered from a different place

released in favour of petitioner No. 1 being its owner at

subsequent stage of investigation. Petitioners’ complicity is

suspected especially in view of their alleged association with co-

accused Ganesh Tiwary.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in

the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within

four weeks, let the petitioners namely, Ram Anuragh Mahto and

Ram Pravesh Mahto, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond

of Rs. 10, 000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the

like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Barh (Dist. Patna) in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 02

of 2010 subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of

the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain
2

physically present before the court below on each and every date

at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is

earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without

giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be

deemed to be cancelled.

Prakash                                       (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)