IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 4445 of 2009(D)
1. SREE LAKSHMI.S, D/O. A.R. SUBRAMANIAN,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE PRINCIPAL,
... Respondent
2. THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE CONVENER,
3. THE GENERAL CONVENER,
4. THE GENERAL CONVENER,
For Petitioner :SRI.K.MUHAMMED SALAHUDHEEN
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :11/02/2009
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
-------------------------
W.P.(C.) No.4445 of 2009
---------------------------------
Dated, this the 11th day of February, 2009
J U D G M E N T
In the Calicut University B Zone Arts Festival, the petitioner had
participated in Kuchippudi and Folk Dance competitions. For
Kuchippudi, she was given third prize and for Folk Dance, 2nd prize.
Aggrieved by the prizes that were given, she filed Exts.P1 & P2
appeals. These appeals have been rejected by the appellate
committee as per Exts.P3 & P4. It is challenging the appellate
orders, and praying that she be given the 1st prize, the writ petition
is filed.
2. First of all, it is to be noticed that both the first prize
winners in the respective items have not been impleaded in the writ
petition, and therefore, any order disturbing their position cannot be
passed in this writ petition. Even otherwise, though personal
allegations have been made against the judges, they also are not
parties in the writ petition. That apart, I also noticed that even in
Exts.P1 & P2 appeals filed, the grounds urged in the writ petition
have not been taken.
WP(C) No.4445/2009
-2-
3. Therefore, in these circumstances, I cannot find any
material to hold that either the assessment of the performance by
the Judges or the decision rendered by the appellate committee is
erroneous warranting interference.
The writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed.
(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
jg