IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.34158 of 2010
MANOJ RAI
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
03. 10.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner
and the State.
Huge quantity of kerosene oil is
recovered from premises owned by Laxman Pahalwan
and half fill tanker and a motorcycle was also
standing there. Laxman Pahalwan is said landlord
while this petitioner is tenant when the
recovery was made. Laxman Pahalwan disclosed
that petitioner is tenant of the premises. Later
by filing an affidavit, it is shown that he is
deviating from his earlier statement, but
witnesses in paras-14, 22 and 23 are there to
state that petitioner was tenant of the premises
for keeping his empty drums. One thing more goes
against this petitioner that he is able to
manage and tamper the co-accused that is why
affidavit is filed on behalf of Laxman Pahalwan.
Accordingly, prayer of petitioner for
anticipatory bail stands rejected.
Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)