High Court Karnataka High Court

D K Prabhakar vs State Of Karnataka on 25 November, 2009

Karnataka High Court
D K Prabhakar vs State Of Karnataka on 25 November, 2009
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
IN THE. HEGH COURT 0;: KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
Dated this the 25"' day of November, 2909

Before

THE I:ION'BLE MR JUSTICE H UL-U 'I/ADI G L'  A' 

Criminal Petition 5623 / 2009 

Between .-

D K Prabhakar S/0 D K Venkatesh
48 yrs. Karvi Keri, Kundapur   " ._ *  A . V ;
UdupiTa1uk & District   A'  V _Pe:_i:ioneu~ 

(By Sri S N Bhat, Adv.)
And:

1 State of KarnataI<a.V-- by   -  V
Supe1'intenden2. 'otT_P'_r---iice 

Dimctorate T6fT.C.iv_j1 ghts '_
Enfor;:eme11tVCei},.BgmgTa1O;:..Eice'*.
 Rights Er§fQrce1nen': Cell
4.Mang3]A0m_  _____ 

l\.)

3». V  "S:a:e' :.::by:V}{:1:iid:1pu1' Police Station

*IKu'ndap'LrI'.,  I V V  Respondents

 (By Srijé. V R'a':n§i¥£'1'ishna, G-P)

 n This  C(I':}.1"f1i1'l£i} Pegizion is filed uncier 3.482 of the Cr.PC praying to

  q-fin-zh thé*«F1.RfC1'ime I\fo.29()/2008 before £he Kundzipu1'P03iC<:.

 This Criminal P{:£iEi0I1 c  0:2 for Admission this day, the Court

 'mexé-3 the following:



ix}

ORDER

Government Pieacier to take notice.

Petitioner has sought for qtiashing the FIR in Crirneii

registered before the Kundapur Police for mic’ ‘offenciie pttinisihablievfinder

S.3(1)(9) and 7( E )(2) of the Karnataka SC/ST.ii{P’rei.i_entii0niiof_:2\t.rocitie.si)arétciéi _

E989. _ ._ _ ._
Petitioner joined the services inii*Cyana_ra Ba’r1}<y_:o'ri 24.3.2980 by

producing the caste certificate ohta~i.:1ed the"T_ahsi'l'dar on 17.3.1978 stating

that he beEt'iirigisiiVt(3et..i§,otegaificoitiinttnity. 'However. later the District Caste
Verification iContn1i.t1eeheadccibyte-.tiie_. Deputy Commissioner canceiied the

caste certificate oh–tain'cr1Vby__thc.V1§eii.€~'ioner, by his order dated 27.5.2005.

The igovernineunt yide its notification dated 11.3.2002 protects such of

A'-those' 'p¢rS()11§ like' the petitioner who have obtained faise caste. certificate, on

surfs/.nd~e_;' of" caste certificates obtained, by treating their

0 ;ippt)inti'n.ent ._tintie.ri–'ge.nerz11 merit category and that they shall not be eligible for

W any f_)1'()1I]()[i€)I2 er other benefits under the SC/ST category in future.

st"

In the case on hand, the Deputy Commissi0ne.r of the Caste

Verification Committee, by his order dated 27.5.2005, has aiready c:’1_11t::j11ed

the cane certificate obtained by the petitioner. That apart, the–.. ‘iv!,_3′.2OO;?,.A

government order atso protects the interest of the petitioner.” __

In View of the same, the comptaint fi.Ied’éigaifis;L« ¥,t1e-.’pet.;itéQ:’1″e;r regi;~;t’ereC}’

in F1 R./Crime N0.290/2009 by the Kundapur Potétte ” .

Petition is atlowed.

Government Pleader to t”:t’e_ :.t1e_n1()_0t’2.;1ppeé;s-rémeewithin four weeks.

An