High Court Kerala High Court

P.Abdul Gafoor vs The State Of Kerala on 20 March, 2009

Kerala High Court
P.Abdul Gafoor vs The State Of Kerala on 20 March, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA.No. 681 of 2009()


1. P.ABDUL GAFOOR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.SAMSUDIN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.S.R.BANNURMATH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH

 Dated :20/03/2009

 O R D E R
             S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. & Kurian Joseph, J.
                ------------------------------------------
                       W.A.No. 681 of 2009
                ------------------------------------------
              Dated, this the 20th day of March, 2009

                           JUDGMENT

S.R.Bannurmath, C.J.

This writ appeal is filed challenging the order passed by

the learned Single Judge dated 9th February, 2009 dismissing

W.P. (C) No.4134 of 2009 filed by the appellant herein

challenging the seizure of the tipper lorry bearing Registration

No.KL-10/T.2357 on 13.9.2008 while transporting river sand

without valid authorization/pass and for ordering deposit of

Rs.1,40,000/- for release of the vehicle.

2. After hearing the learned counsel and going through

the records and the impugned order passed by the learned Single

Judge, we do not find any illegality or error for a reconsideration.

Admittedly, the appellant did not possess any authorized pass for

transportation of river sand. His contention that he had pass is

without any basis and proof. Similarly, the contention that copy of

W.A. No. 681 of 2009

– 2 –

the mahazar was not served on the appellant is also of no use since

no prejudice is caused to the appellant by the non-furnishing of the

mahazar. Noting the fact that the vehicle is being used for

unauthorized transportation of sand on earlier occasions also, the

order passed by the District Collector for seizure and considering

the year of make of the vehicle, fixing the value of the seized

vehicle at Rs.1,40,000/- appears to be just and proper and as such

the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge needs no

interference.

The writ appeal stands dismissed.

S.R.Bannurmath,
Chief Justice

Kurian Joseph,
Judge
vns/dk.