High Court Kerala High Court

Rosamma vs Additional District Magistrate on 15 March, 2010

Kerala High Court
Rosamma vs Additional District Magistrate on 15 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 7370 of 2010(U)


1. ROSAMMA,W/O.CHACKO,KURUSINKAL HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,KSEB

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.I.SAGEER

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :15/03/2010

 O R D E R
                     P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J
                   ---------------------------
                        W.P(C) No.7370 of 2010-U
                  ----------------------------
              Dated this the 15th day of March, 2010.

                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved of the steps being pursued by the

second respondent for drawing the overhead line across the

property and residential building of the petitioner situated in ‘two

cents’ of land. It is stated that, pursuant to the direction given by

this Court, the second respondent has passed Ext.P4, referring the

matter for being adjudicated by the first respondent, way back in

October 2009. It is stated that the matter was finally heard by the

first respondent after giving notice to all concerned, despite which

the orders are still to be passed.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved of the delay in finalising the

matter, more so, when the financial institution from whom the

petitioner had availed the loan for effecting construction, is very

much pressuring the petitioner and that the petitioner is not in a

position to enjoy the property in a peaceful manner.

3. Heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the

first respondent and the learned Government Pleader appearing for

W.P(C) No.7370 of 2010-U 2

the first respondent.

4. In the above circumstances, the first respondent is

directed to pass final orders in the above proceedings stated as

pending before him. This shall be done, as expeditiously as

possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a

copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
JUDGE

ab