High Court Kerala High Court

P.Rahim vs The State Of Kerala Represented By … on 25 May, 2007

Kerala High Court
P.Rahim vs The State Of Kerala Represented By … on 25 May, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 4299 of 2007(S)


1. P.RAHIM, ADVOCATE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :25/05/2007

 O R D E R
                H.L.DATTU, C.J.   &   K.T.SANKARAN, J.

                 ------------------------------------------

                            W.P.(C) No.4299 of 2007

                  ------------------------------------------

                Dated, this the   25th day of May,  2007


                                  JUDGMENT

H.L.Dattu, C.J.

An advocate who calls himself a public spirited citizen is

before us in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution for direction to the respondents to take immediate

steps for selection and appointment to the posts of Presidents

and members of the District Consumer Protection Forums in the

State in accordance with the provisions of the Consumer

Protection Act, 1986 and the Consumer Protection Rules, 2005.

2. This Court after entertaining the writ petition had issued

notice to the respondents.

3. The second respondent has entered appearance and has

filed his counter affidavit before this Court. At paragraph 4 of

the counter affidavit the second respondent has stated as under:

“4. Pursuant to the panel already received,

interview was conducted on 1st, 2nd and 5th of March,

2007 and the Government are awaiting for the panel

for recommendation of appointment from the

W.P.(C) No.4299/2007 2

selection committee. It is submitted that State

Government is giving top priority for filling up the

post of various forums of Consumer Disputes

Redressal Forums. The delay in filling up of the

vacancy arose only due to administrative exigencies.

The contention raised by the petitioner that the

delay occurred on account of the extraneous reasons

is incorrect and hence denied. It is submitted that

the entire process of selection will be completed at

the earliest.

4. In principle, the second respondent agrees that the posts

of Presidents and members of the District Consumer Protection

Forums in the State require to be filled up and he also states that

the same will be done at the earliest.

5. In view of the statement made by the second

respondent in his counter affidavit, in our opinion, the only

direction that requires to be issued in this writ petition is to direct

respondent No.2 to fill up the posts of Presidents and members of

the District Consumer Protection Forums in the State as

expeditiously as possible.

In view of the above, the following: The writ petition is

allowed. The second respondent is directed to fill up the posts of

Presidents and members of the District Consumer Protection

W.P.(C) No.4299/2007 3

Forums in the State in accordance with the provisions of the

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and the Consumer Protection

Rules, 2005 as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within

four months from today. Ordered accordingly.

(H.L.DATTU)

Chief Justice

(K.T.SANKARAN)

Judge

vns