Karnataka High Court
Smt Sakamma vs Bruhat Bangalroe Mahanagara … on 11 December, 2008
{N THE HIGH comm' OF KARNATAKA AT BANGA:4:'2;'i§I;=":; A'
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY 09
BEFORE -w.,A m _ % '
THE HON'BLE MR. JUsTIcERAvi
WRIT PETITION NO.15iV$L§..()F'fi?d@.(I%§;3EMP}";
BETWEEN: % &
1 SMT SAKAMMA 7
W10. MUNEVENKA'I'AP¥*A._
AoEmABoz.rrs9Y;:m2s.." ._ 1 .,
R/O. xALYAN_I'sLU;yI, 15TH cRc~ss,_
sAMPANQ1RAMANG'2RA =
BANGALo}2;n;."V-v---:~_V__
.. ' PETYFIONER
(By Sri sREEi'D'1~:ga1§'z~,$sc§}c:m'rEs, ADVOCATES}
AND: 1' ' "
1 ,3:<az_;HA'f B.ANG'I\L(Z§'RETMAHANAGARA PALIKE
~ =1N .§2.~ SQUARE .
" BFs-T\§GA'I;ORE
2 , _V REVPVIS'.-' ¥'i7S_SPE;CIAL COMMISSi0NER (PROJEUB
TH'E.'REVE1'€UE2 OFFICER
BRUHP3' BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALM:
sawrsmcl RAMA NAGARA
SHIVAJI NAGAR AREA
QUEENS ROAD
= L .. 4_ BANGALQRE
' "THE ADMINISTRATOR
KARNATAKA STATE MAHILA MILAN
NATIONAL SLUM DWELLERS F'EDERA'I'iON
POBBATHI MATERNITY HOME
SAJJAN RAG CIRCLE,
V V PURAM
BANGALORE ~ 560004.
RESPONDENTS
(L;
THES w.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 85 227 ~’C§E=’ §*HE._
CONS’I’I’TU’1’ION OF’ ENDIIA PRAYING TO DiR.EC3T” é
RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION ‘i:v{£§E)E—-g *
BY THE PE”I’§T1ONER AS PER 1. FOR ALLOTMENT OR A
IN HER FAVOUR IN KALYANI SLUM AREA»
This writ petition, comixig 0nT .j:>15t§1i1’1’i’1:1:–;r5«?:,T_Aé
hearing, this day, the Court, Vmadé«§Iis:V_follow’i_-x;g:, 2
In View of the ceunsel
for the J as withdrawn
with “”” the same cause of
action. -.
Sd/–
Judge
emf; V