Gujarat High Court High Court

United vs Jagdishbhai on 13 August, 2008

Gujarat High Court
United vs Jagdishbhai on 13 August, 2008
Author: H.K.Rathod,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/7384/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR STAY No. 7384 of 2008
 

In


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 2864 of 2008
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

UNITED
INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

JAGDISHBHAI
JIVANLAL BAROT PROP OF MARUTI TRAVELS & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
VIBHUTI NANAVATI for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
RULE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent(s) : 1, 
MR
PARESH M DARJI for Respondent(s) :
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 13/08/2008 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

Heard
learned Advocate Mr. Nanavati for the applicant insurance company
and learned advocate Mr.Paresh Darji for opponent no.2.

This
Court has granted ad interim relief in terms of para 6(A) on 3rd
July, 2008.

Therefore,
considering the submissions made by the learned advocates for the
respective parties, amounts which have been deposited by the
applicant insurance company before the claims tribunal, after
realising the same, it is directed to the claims tribunal concerned
to invest the said amount with the Nationalized Bank for a period of
three years with periodical renewal in the name of the claimants.
Such FDRs in the name of the claimants shall remain in the custody
of the Nazir of the Claims Tribunal concerned till the appeal is
decided by this court. Respondent claimant is entitled for
periodical interests only from such FDRs. It is clarified that the
interim relief granted by this Court is qua applicant insurance
company alone and, therefore, it is open for the respondents
claimants to execute the impugned award against the rest of the
respondents as per the award. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

(H.K.

Rathod,J.)

Vyas

   

Top